xiaoge.ji@concentrix.com — Coaching Report

Week of 2026-05-25 – 2026-05-31


At a Glance

Calls HandledAvg Handle TimeTop ProductTop ProblemCases DocumentedCases Escalated
38m 00sMR7500HARDWARE21

Scorecard

DimensionThis WeekCalls Reviewed
Accuracy3.003
Protocol1.003
Communication1.673
Overall2.333

3 calls reviewed. Score range: 1.0 – 3.0


This Week's Coverage

Models Supported

ModelCallsAvg Score
MR750023.0

No models scored below 2.5. The MR7500 calls performed adequately overall, but protocol and communication scores indicate room for improvement in case handling and customer interaction.

Problem Categories

CategoryCallsAvg ScoreFocus Area?
HARDWARE23.0
SETUP11.0

The SETUP category shows a critical weakness with an average score of 1.0. This suggests a need for focused training on product identification and setup procedures to avoid misguidance and improve resolution rates.


What Went Well

You correctly identified the MR7500 model during the hardware issue call, which is essential for appropriate case handling and escalation.

> “My Wi‑Fi Router has a problem. […] The power on light, whether red or blue, is not lighting up.”

#PR00130372


Growth Opportunities

  1. Product misidentification leading to incorrect guidance

Misidentifying the Velop MX2000 as a “mouse” or “loader” caused confusion and incorrect instructions. Always verify the exact product model before proceeding.

> “How many units do you have? Mouse.”

#LTS00130812

  1. Failure to perform basic troubleshooting

For non‑responsive routers, basic checks (power cycle, adapter test) should always be attempted before escalation. Skipping these steps delays resolution and frustrates customers.

> “The power on light, whether red or blue, is not lighting up. Actually it was working fine and then suddenly became like this.”

#PR00130372


Next Week's Focus


Technical Accuracy

Agent misidentified Velop MX2000 as a 'mouse' or 'loader' and provided incorrect reset instructions (15 seconds instead of 10). Correct product identification and reset procedures are critical for setup issues (#LTS00130812).

Agent failed to perform any troubleshooting for a non-responsive router (power LED issue) and did not collect essential device information (model, serial, warranty). Basic troubleshooting and warranty verification are required for hardware cases (#PR00130372).

Agent directed customer to call PAT DATA without providing a case number or confirming the correct escalation path, leaving the customer to restart the process. Case management protocol requires providing clear next steps and references (#PR00130372).


Coaching Moments

> “How many units do you have? Mouse.”

Misidentifying the product as a “mouse” led to confusion and incorrect guidance. Always verify the exact product model before proceeding.

#LTS00130812


Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did

#PR00130372 — Resolved by Level 2

1. Always collect model, serial number, and warranty information for hardware issues.

2. Perform basic troubleshooting (power cycle, adapter check) before escalating.

3. When escalating, provide all relevant details and a clear next-step reference for the customer.


Coach Appendix

Highest-signal trend: Consistent product misidentification and insufficient basic troubleshooting before escalation, particularly in setup and hardware cases. Focus next week on early model confirmation and running standard diagnostic steps for power/LED issues. Ensure all escalations include complete case context and customer references.


This Week's Calls

CaseDateScoreDirectionProductCategoryOutcome
#LTS001308122026-05-26 01:00:161.0INBOUNDMX2000SETUPAgent promised to email a setup guide within 48 hours; no fix confirmed and no troubleshooting path completed.
#PR001303722026-05-26 03:05:323.0INBOUNDHARDWARE↑ Escalated
#PR001303722026-05-26 03:38:283.0INBOUNDMR7500HARDWAREAdvised customer to call PAT DATA (256-516-82) to follow up on replacement or refund status.