# jeneth.villanil@concentrix.com — Coaching Report

Week of 2026-06-01 – 2026-06-07


At a Glance

Calls HandledAvg Handle TimeTop ProductTop ProblemCases DocumentedCases Escalated
18m 29sMX8000SETUP10

Scorecard

DimensionThis WeekCalls Reviewed
Accuracy1.001
Protocol1.001
Communication1.001
Overall1.001

Scores reflect performance across 1 call reviewed. Overall score range: 1.00 (lowest) to 1.00 (highest).


Where Time Goes

Product Families

Product family data not available for this week.

Problem Categories

CategoryCallsAvg Handle TimeAvg OverallAvg AccuracyAvg ProtocolAvg CommunicationFocus Area?
SETUP18m 29s1.001.001.001.00

Focus Area: SETUP

The single SETUP call consumed substantial time and earned the lowest possible scores across all categories. This pattern suggests a need for stronger issue identification and protocol adherence to reduce handle time and improve resolution rates.


Week-over-Week Movement

Key focus points from prior week remain critical: protocol adherence, technical accuracy, and issue identification.


What Went Well

Opening protocol and legal compliance
The call opened with a clear, compliant welcome message that included warranty registration guidance and required disclosures.
[00:00] CHANNEL_RIGHT: Welcome to Linksys Support. To ensure quality service, your call may be monitored. For in-warranty products, our support team is available to help with performance and hardware issues. Register your product by visiting Register.linksys.com. Please have your device's serial number ready...]
This sets a professional tone and aligns with required scripting.
Ticket documentation
The agent successfully created a HappyFox ticket (#LTS00077962), ensuring the case was recorded for follow-up.

Growth Opportunities

Protocol adherence and issue identification
The call lacked essential upfront data collection (model, serial number, warranty status) and clear issue confirmation. Good looks like:
1. Greet and confirm legal terms
2. Immediately ask for product model, serial number, and warranty status
3. Use structured questions to pinpoint the customer’s exact problem statement
[No issue identification occurred; the agent proceeded directly to troubleshooting without gathering basics.]
Next step: Practice the "3 Ws" (What device? What issue? When did it start?) before any troubleshooting.
Technical accuracy and resolution
Guidance provided (counting to 60, unplugging without context) deviated from KB-compliant steps and lacked technical basis. Good looks like:
1. Reference KB articles for recommended steps
2. Explain the purpose of each action to the customer
3. Verify success criteria before concluding
[The agent instructed: “In theory, we count to 60. 1, 2, 3…” with no explanation or technical rationale.]
Next step: Anchor all steps to approved troubleshooting flows and document outcomes.

Next Week's Focus

  1. Start every call with the "3 Ws" (device model, serial number, warranty status) and confirm the exact customer issue in your own words before proceeding.
  2. Use only KB-approved steps for common SETUP scenarios; explain the purpose of each action to the customer.
  3. Close calls with clear next steps (e.g., “We’ll follow up via ticket #LTS00077962,” or “Please reboot and confirm…”).
  4. Review SETUP category KB articles to build familiarity with standard troubleshooting paths.

Technical Accuracy

Improvement

Agent failed to collect basic product details (model, serial number, warranty status) and provided non-KB-compliant guidance (counting to 60 as a fix). No valid troubleshooting path was followed.
#LTS00077962

Improvement

Agent provided materially inaccurate guidance with no technical basis, deviating from KB-compliant troubleshooting steps.
#LTS00077962

Coaching Moments

Improvement

The agent instructed the customer to perform an unstructured counting exercise (“count to 60”) with no technical justification or alignment to KB procedures.
[08:00] CHANNEL_LEFT: In theory, we count to 60. 1, 2, 3. T...
Note: Replace ad-hoc steps with documented troubleshooting sequences. Always explain why a step is being taken.
#LTS00077962

Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did

No escalation occurred this week. No Level 2 resolution insights are available to guide future L1 handling.


Coach Appendix

Internal coaching context only:

This week’s single call highlights systemic gaps in protocol initiation and technical grounding. The agent completed ticket creation but missed foundational data collection and KB alignment, resulting in a resolution failure. Focus for next coaching should emphasize the “3 Ws” framework and KB anchoring for SETUP cases to prevent repeat patterns. Transcript evidence confirms the absence of model/serial collection and non-compliant counting instruction as root causes of low scores.


This Week's Calls

CaseDateScoreDirectionProductCategoryOutcome
#LTS000779622026-06-011INBOUNDMX8000SETUP⚠ Closed incorrectly