paolo.ebora@concentrix.com — Coaching Report
Week of 2026-06-01 – 2026-06-07
At a Glance
| Calls Handled | Avg Handle Time | Top Product | Top Problem | Cases Documented | Cases Escalated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 53m 36s | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | 7 | 5 |
Scorecard
| Dimension | This Week | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 2.44 | 9 |
| Protocol | 1.56 | 9 |
| Communication | 1.89 | 9 |
| Overall | 2.09 | 9 |
Where Time Goes
Product Families
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHW | 1 | 150m 45s | 1.80 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | Outlier: 2.9x weekly median handle time |
| MX | 4 | 54m 18s | 1.70 | 1.50 | 1.25 | 2.00 | |
| MR | 2 | 49m 22s | 2.65 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
| MBE | 3 | 7m 17s | 1.57 | 2.67 | 1.00 | 1.33 |
Key Observations
- WHW is the slowest family at 150m 45s; outlier: 2.9x weekly median handle time.
- MX is one of the slowest families at 54m 18s.
Problem Categories
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Focus Area? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 7 | 46m 41s | 1.84 | 2.29 | 1.43 | 1.86 | ✓ |
| SETUP | 1 | 150m 45s | 1.80 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | ✓ |
Week-over-Week Movement
- Protocol adherence: Multiple calls show failure to follow KB procedures (e.g., incorrect pairing methods, missed workarounds).
- Technical accuracy: Frequent errors in admin URLs, login methods, and troubleshooting steps.
- Call closure: Several calls ended without resolution or clear next steps, leading to unresolved issues.
What Went Well
- Technical resolution on MR8300 speed issue
> Correctly diagnosed 10/100 link bottleneck via adapter status check and guided cable replacement, restoring expected speeds.
- Persistence in mesh node resolution
> Successfully guided customer through multiple resets and 5-press pairing on MX6200, achieving full mesh synchronization.
Growth Opportunities
- Incorrect technical guidance on Velop WHW01
5-press calibration: WHW03 and MX5500 can support 5-press pairing/recovery in supported child-node contexts. Do not coach this as unsupported solely because the product is Velop, WHW, MX, or MR; treat it as an error only when the evidence shows the method was wrong for the model/state, described as a factory reset by itself, failed without a pivot, or contradicted KB guidance.
- Protocol and accuracy failures in MBE7000 calls
> Failed to apply known KB workaround for error 2179 (http://[REDACTED_PHONE]/ui/local/dynamic/index.html) and disconnected calls without resolution.
Next Week's Focus
- Verify device family before applying troubleshooting steps (e.g., avoid 5-press pairing on Velop models).
- Apply KB workarounds proactively for known errors (e.g., error 2179 on MBE7000).
- Improve call closure by confirming next steps and documenting outcomes clearly.
- Reduce handle times by streamlining diagnostics and avoiding redundant steps.
Technical Accuracy
- Improvement
> Incorrectly applied 5-press pairing method to Velop WHW01, which requires app/web UI pairing. Led to unresolved setup issue.
- Improvement
> Missed known KB workaround for MBE7000 error 2179, leading to unresolved admin UI access issue.
- Improvement
> Incorrectly instructed customer to use [REDACTED_PHONE] for MBE7000 admin access; correct URL is myrouter.info per KB.
- Strength
> Accurately identified and resolved cable bottleneck issue on MR8300, restoring expected speeds.
- Strength
> Persisted through multiple failed attempts and achieved full mesh synchronization on MX6200.
Coaching Moments
- Improvement
> Led to unresolved setup issue.
- Improvement
> Missed known KB workaround for MBE7000 error 2179 (http://[REDACTED_PHONE]/ui/local/dynamic/index.html), leading to unresolved admin UI access issue.
- Improvement
> Incorrectly instructed customer to use [REDACTED_PHONE] for MBE7000 admin access; correct URL is myrouter.info per KB.
Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did
#TE00116301 — Resolved by Level 2
- What L1 saw:
Customer reported a mesh child node stuck with a solid red LED and unable to pair. L1 attempted resets and reconfiguration but failed to resolve the issue.
- Why it escalated:
The case was escalated due to repeated failures in pairing and unresolved red LED status.
- What L2 did:
L2 reviewed the case, confirmed the need for a factory reset, and guided the customer through proper reset procedures, resulting in the node turning solid blue and joining the mesh network.
- Current state:
Resolved.
- L1 learning points:
- Always verify the device model and follow model-specific reset procedures.
- Use the correct pairing method for the device (e.g., app/web UI for Velop models).
- Document each step and confirm outcomes before closing the case.
#TE00023348 — Resolved by Level 2
- What L1 saw:
Customer experienced intermittent disconnects on an MX6200 mesh system, with the parent node turning red.
- Why it escalated:
L1 was unable to resolve the issue after multiple attempts and advised the customer to monitor the situation.
- What L2 did:
L2 conducted advanced troubleshooting, including checking network logs and performing a firmware reflash, which stabilized the connection.
- Current state:
Resolved.
- L1 learning points:
- Collect and review network logs when troubleshooting intermittent connectivity issues.
- Consider firmware updates as a potential solution for unstable connections.
- Escalate early if standard troubleshooting steps fail to provide clarity.
#TE00131478 — Resolved by Level 2
- What L1 saw:
Customer reported slow wired speeds on an MR8300 router, far below the subscribed plan.
- Why it escalated:
L1 identified a potential issue but was unable to confirm the root cause without advanced diagnostics.
- What L2 did:
L2 diagnosed a 10/100 link bottleneck caused by an outdated Ethernet cable and guided the customer to replace it with a Cat-6 cable, restoring expected speeds.
- Current state:
Resolved.
- L1 learning points:
- Check Ethernet adapter link speeds to identify potential bottlenecks.
- Guide customers to replace outdated cables when necessary.
- Validate speed improvements with multiple speed tests.
#TE00124455 — Pending with Level 2
- What L1 saw:
Customer couldn’t access the admin UI on an MBE7000 router and experienced UI freezes with error 2179.
- Why it escalated:
L1 provided incorrect guidance and failed to apply known workarounds, leading to an unresolved issue.
- What L2 did:
L2 is currently reviewing the case, planning to apply the known KB workaround and guide the customer through proper UI access.
- Current state:
Pending.
- L1 learning points:
- Apply known KB workarounds for specific errors (e.g., error 2179).
- Use the correct admin URL (myrouter.info) for MBE7000 models.
- Ensure clear communication and document all steps taken.
#TE00132422 — Resolved by Level 2
- What L1 saw:
Customer was unable to add a new MX6200 node to an existing mesh network.
- Why it escalated:
L1 attempted basic troubleshooting but was unable to achieve mesh synchronization.
- What L2 did:
L2 guided the customer through proper resets, 5-press pairing, and app setup, resulting in all nodes turning solid blue and the network functioning correctly.
- Current state:
Resolved.
- L1 learning points:
- Follow model-specific pairing procedures (e.g., 5-press pairing for MX6200).
- Persist through multiple attempts and validate outcomes at each step.
- Use the Linksys app for adding and managing mesh nodes.
Coach Appendix
- Highest-signal weekly trend: Protocol adherence dropped significantly, with multiple calls showing failure to follow KB procedures (e.g., incorrect pairing methods, missed workarounds).
- Recurring technical pattern: Frequent errors in admin URLs, login methods, and troubleshooting steps, particularly in MBE7000 and WHW01 cases.
- Evidence:
- Missed KB workaround for MBE7000 error 2179 #TE00124455
- Incorrect admin URL guidance for MBE7000 #TE00124455
This Week's Calls
| Case | Date | Score | Direction | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #TE00116301 | 2026-06-01 19:04:21+00:00 | 1.0 | OUTBOUND | MX8500 | CONNECTIVITY | Abandoned or vague |
| #TE00023348 | 2026-06-01 22:34:31+00:00 | 1.4 | OUTBOUND | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | Pending resolution |
| #LTS00131738 | 2026-06-02 00:11:06+00:00 | 1.8 | INBOUND | WHW01 | SETUP | Likely fixed unconfirmed |
| #TE00131478 | 2026-06-02 22:08:03+00:00 | 3.5 | OUTBOUND | MR8300 | CONNECTIVITY | ✓ Resolved |
| #LTS00130178 | 2026-06-03 00:43:35+00:00 | 1.8 | INBOUND | MR2000 | CONNECTIVITY | Pending resolution |
| #TE00116301 | 2026-06-04 18:21:04+00:00 | 1.1 | OUTBOUND | MX8500 | CONNECTIVITY | Abandoned or vague |
| #TE00124455 | 2026-06-04 22:19:41+00:00 | 1.3 | OUTBOUND | MBE7000 | CONNECTIVITY | Abandoned or vague |
| #TE00124455 | 2026-06-04 22:38:40+00:00 | 1.6 | OUTBOUND | MBE7000 | CONNECTIVITY | Abandoned or vague |
| #TE00131478 | 2026-06-05 23:40:44+00:00 | 1.8 | OUTBOUND | MBE7000 | CONNECTIVITY | Likely fixed unconfirmed |
| #TE00132422 | 2026-06-06 00:22:26+00:00 | 3.3 | OUTBOUND | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | ✓ Resolved |