alvin.edio@concentrix.com — Coaching Report

Week of 2026-05-25 – 2026-05-31


At a Glance

Calls HandledAvg Handle TimeTop ProductTop ProblemCases DocumentedCases Escalated
47m 52sMBE7000CONNECTIVITY41

Scorecard

DimensionThis WeekCalls Reviewed
Accuracy3.004
Protocol2.254
Communication2.004
Overall2.424

Where Time Goes

Product Families

FamilyCallsAvg Handle TimeAvg OverallAvg AccuracyAvg ProtocolAvg CommunicationNote
MBE110m 10s1.501.001.001.00
MX19m 12s3.505.003.002.00
EA16m 32s1.701.002.003.00
WRT15m 36s3.005.003.002.00

Key Observations

Problem Categories

CategoryCallsAvg Handle TimeAvg OverallAvg AccuracyAvg ProtocolAvg CommunicationFocus Area?
CONNECTIVITY110m 10s1.501.001.001.00
NO TROUBLESHOOTING NEEDED19m 12s3.505.003.002.00
SETUP15m 36s3.005.003.002.00
ACCESS16m 32s1.701.002.003.00

Week-over-Week Movement

What Went Well

Accurate EOL identification

Correctly identified the MX5300 as end-of-life and accurately cited the final firmware release date (April 14, 2022) per KB (universal_eol_firmware.md).

#LTS00130800

Legacy device support guidance

Accurately identified the WRT54GV5 as a legacy device no longer supported and provided the correct support URL: https://support.linksys.com.

#LTS00130803


Growth Opportunities

Incorrect product identification

Misidentified the product as MBE70 instead of MX6200 at [03:00], leading to materially incorrect technical context.

#TE00128179

Next step: Always verify the exact product model and family before proceeding with troubleshooting. Use the customer's description and any available documentation to confirm the device type.

No troubleshooting performed

Failed to perform any basic troubleshooting steps (e.g., speed test, WAN check, node restart) despite customer describing a solvable performance issue.

#TE00128179

Next step: For performance issues, always perform at least one basic troubleshooting step before escalating. This includes speed tests, WAN checks, and basic node restarts as outlined in the KB.


Next Week's Focus


Technical Accuracy

Improvement

Misidentified product as MBE70 instead of MX6200, leading to incorrect technical context. This contradicts KB guidance for MX6200 setup and troubleshooting.

#TE00128179

Improvement

Failed to perform basic troubleshooting (speed test, WAN check, node restart) despite customer describing a solvable performance issue. KB explicitly requires these steps for speed/performance issues.

#TE00128179

Improvement

Provided incorrect technical advice for changing account email (factory reset of EA-9300). Correct method is via Linksys website/app.

#LTS00130806

Strength

Correctly identified MX5300 as end-of-life and provided accurate last firmware date (April 14, 2022) per KB (universal_eol_firmware.md).

#LTS00130800

Strength

Accurately identified WRT54GV5 as legacy device and provided correct support URL (support.linksys.com).

#LTS00130803


Coaching Moments

No additional coaching moments were extracted after the technical review.


Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did

#TE00128179 — Resolved by Level 2

What L1 saw: Customer reported buffering and poor performance after switching to business internet and replacing a mesh node with an MX6200, suspecting VLAN throughput limitations between the modem and the node.

Why it escalated: The case was escalated due to incorrect product identification (MBE70 instead of MX6200) and lack of basic troubleshooting steps, making it difficult for L2 to proceed effectively.

Related call chain: This was part of a longer chain of interactions where the customer had previously been misinformed and received inconsistent guidance across multiple agents.

What L2 did: L2 conducted follow-up calls, had the customer disable IPV6 Automatic and express forwarding, generated logs, offered remote access via Zoho, and ultimately guided the customer through resetting and reconfiguring the nodes to remove artifacts of discontinued cloud services (LSWF).

Current state: The case is resolved.

L1 learning points:

  1. Always verify the exact product model and family before proceeding.
  2. For performance issues, perform basic troubleshooting steps (speed tests, WAN checks, node restarts) before escalation.
  3. When customers mention switching ISPs or replacing nodes, gather detailed information about the new setup and any changes made.

Coach Appendix

Highest-signal weekly trend: The most significant issue this week was incorrect product identification leading to flawed troubleshooting and escalation. This highlights a need for stricter verification processes before proceeding with any technical steps.

Recurring pattern: Misidentification of product models and families, particularly confusing MBE and MX series, led to incorrect technical context and ineffective support. This pattern should inform the next coaching conversation to emphasize product verification and KB alignment.

No additional coach-only appendix material was extracted this week.


This Week's Calls

CaseDateScoreDirectionProductCategoryOutcome
#LTS001308002026-05-25 23:53:38+00:003.5INBOUNDMX5300NO TROUBLESHOOTING NEEDED✓ Resolved
#TE001281792026-05-26 00:10:43+00:001.5INBOUNDMBE7000CONNECTIVITY↑ Escalated
#LTS001308032026-05-26 00:29:24+00:003.0INBOUNDWRT54GSETUP✓ Likely resolved
#LTS001308062026-05-26 00:38:26+00:001.7INBOUNDEA9300ACCESS⏳ Pending