eppie.lagumbay — Coaching Report
Week of 2026-05-25 – 2026-05-31
At a Glance
| Calls Handled | Avg Handle Time | Top Product | Top Problem | Cases Documented | Cases Escalated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 23m 55s | — | CONNECTIVITY | 18 | 1 |
Scorecard
| Dimension | This Week | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 2.00 | 20 |
| Protocol | 1.80 | 20 |
| Communication | 2.20 | 20 |
| Overall | 2.10 | 20 |
Where Time Goes
Product Families
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX | 4 | 34m 10s | 2.80 | 2.75 | 2.25 | 2.50 | |
| MR | 4 | 32m 31s | 2.65 | 2.00 | 1.25 | 2.25 | |
| WHW | 3 | 28m 11s | 2.93 | 3.00 | 2.33 | 2.33 | |
| EA | 2 | 24m 18s | 1.85 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 2.00 | |
| RE | 3 | 12m 55s | 1.07 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.67 | |
| WRT | 1 | 10m 36s | 1.40 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
| OTHER | 4 | 8m 38s | 1.68 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 |
Key Observations
- MX is one of the slowest families at 34m 10s.
- MR is one of the slowest families at 32m 31s.
Problem Categories
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Focus Area? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 9 | 27m 32s | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.80 | 2.20 | ✓ |
| ACCESS | 5 | 24m 14s | 1.70 | 1.40 | 1.60 | 2.00 | ✓ |
| SETUP | 6 | 17m 36s | 2.10 | 2.00 | 1.70 | 2.20 | ✓ |
Week-over-Week Movement
- Overall moved down 0.26 vs. last week.
- Accuracy moved down 0.53 vs. last week.
- Average handle time moved up by 1m 18s.
- Family swing: EA handle time moved up by 11m 51s vs. last week.
- Family swing: OTHER handle time moved down by 7m 14s vs. last week.
- Family swing: MX handle time moved up by 6m 24s vs. last week.
What Went Well
- Accurate model identification and warranty confirmation
- Correctly identified MX2000 mesh system and confirmed warranty coverage, enabling appropriate troubleshooting.
- Effective WAN port diagnosis
- Diagnosed and resolved miswired WAN connection on WHW03 parent node, restoring full network functionality.
Growth Opportunities
- Correct reset and pairing procedures
- Current practice: Instructed 20-second factory reset and 5-press pairing on Velop (MX) devices.
- What good looks like: Use 10-second reset for Velop/MX series and reserve 5-press pairing for LN/Cognitive Mesh only. Verify LED behavior and app connectivity before closing.
- Systematic connectivity troubleshooting
- Current gap: Skipped basic diagnostics (modem check, LED validation, wired connection test) on connectivity issues.
- What good looks like: Follow the “Modem → WAN → LAN → Device” flow: confirm modem link, test WAN port, validate LAN connectivity, then troubleshoot devices. Document findings at each step.
Next Week's Focus
- Master reset durations
- Memorize and apply model-specific reset times: 10s for Velop/MX, 15s for MR/EA, 20s for RE/WRT.
- Build a connectivity diagnostic checklist
- For every connectivity call:
- Verify modem signal and link status.
- Confirm WAN port LED (solid blue/turquoise).
- Test wired connection to router LAN port.
- Validate SSID/Password match before device troubleshooting.
- Double-check URLs and access methods
- Use only myrouter.local, extender.linksys.com, or support.linksys.com — never third-party or misspelled domains.
- Avoid payment processing until resolution is confirmed
- Confirm the customer can complete requested steps before processing paid support fees.
Technical Accuracy
Improvement
- Instructed a 20-second factory reset instead of the correct 10-second reset for Velop devices. Used incorrect 5-press pairing method (not applicable to Velop).
Improvement
- Accepted payment without confirming ability to complete configuration. Provided incorrect manual static IP/DNS setup guidance for EA7430.
Improvement
- Provided incorrect URLs and no actionable setup steps for WRT54G. Failed to guide customer through accessing router admin interface.
Improvement
- Failed to confirm customer was on extender’s SSID before directing to UI access. Provided incorrect URLs.
Improvement
- Provided incorrect default IP address and factory reset duration. Failed to address primary issue (2.4 GHz camera connectivity).
Strength
- Correctly identified model and performed appropriate troubleshooting for MX2000 node connectivity issue.
Strength
- Correctly identified WAN port misconnection and guided customer to proper port, restoring connectivity.
Coaching Moments
No additional coaching moments were extracted after the technical review.
Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did
#GI00127699 — Resolved by Level 2
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| What L1 saw | Customer couldn’t log into Velop admin page (error 2298) after failed reset. Both mesh nodes showed red LEDs. L1 attempted incorrect reset duration, LED interpretation, and pairing method. |
| Why it escalated | Issue persisted after 58 minutes of incorrect L1 guidance; error 2298 indicated deeper admin-password or firmware issue beyond L1 scope. |
| What L2 did | L2 resolution steps were not documented in the local HappyFox snapshot. The case was marked “Resolved” but no technical details were provided. |
| Current state | Resolved per HappyFox status, but L2 actions unknown. |
| L1 learning points | 1. Use 10-second reset for Velop/MX. 2. Never use 5-press pairing on Velop — it’s for LN/Cognitive Mesh only. 3. Verify HTTPS access only after confirming correct admin credentials and WAN connectivity. |
Coach Appendix
Internal use only — not for agent distribution
- Top trend: Inconsistent technical accuracy on reset procedures and connectivity diagnostics, leading to prolonged handles and customer frustration.
- Recurring pattern: Accepting payment before confirming customer capability to complete requested steps, and providing unsupported configuration guidance (e.g., manual IP/DNS on EA series).
- Evidence highlighted above: Calls #GI00127699, #LTS00130982, #LTS00130993, and #LTS00131152 exemplify accuracy gaps in reset timing, model-specific guidance, and pre-payment validation. Focus coaching on model-specific KB adherence and systematic diagnostic flows.
This Week's Calls
| Case | Date | Score | Direction | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #GI00127699 | 2026-05-25 | 1.8 | INBOUND | — | ACCESS | ↑ Escalated |
| #LTS00130982 | 2026-05-27 | 1.8 | INBOUND | EA7430 | CONNECTIVITY | ⏳ Pending |
| #LTS00130993 | 2026-05-27 | 1.4 | INBOUND | WRT54G | SETUP | Abandoned or vague |
| #LTS00063567 | 2026-05-27 | 3.4 | INBOUND | MX2000 | CONNECTIVITY | ✓ Resolved |
| #LTS00131109 | 2026-05-27 | 3.0 | INBOUND | MR8300 | SETUP | Abandoned or vague |
| #LTS00131115 | 2026-05-27 | 1.4 | INBOUND | VLP01 | ACCESS | Abandoned or vague |
| #GI00131124 | 2026-05-27 | 3.0 | INBOUND | MX6200 | SETUP | Pending resolution |
| #LTS00131126 | 2026-05-27 | 3.0 | INBOUND | MR7350 | CONNECTIVITY | Closed with self-help |
| #LTS00131126 | 2026-05-28 | 1.0 | OUTBOUND | MR7350 | CONNECTIVITY | Abandoned or vague |
| #LTS00131146 | 2026-05-28 | 1.1 | INBOUND | RE7000 | ACCESS | Abandoned or vague |
| #LTS00131152 | 2026-05-28 | 1.6 | INBOUND | MR7350 | ACCESS | Abandoned or vague |
| #LTS00131154 | 2026-05-28 | 1.9 | INBOUND | EA8300 | ACCESS | Abandoned or vague |
| #GI00131328 | 2026-05-28 | 3.0 | INBOUND | MX8500 | SETUP | Pending resolution |
| #LTS00131332 | 2026-05-28 | 2.8 | INBOUND | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Abandoned or vague |
| #LTS00131335 | 2026-05-28 | 1.3 | INBOUND | VLP01 | CONNECTIVITY | Incorrectly closed |
| #LTS00131337 | 2026-05-28 | 3.0 | INBOUND | VLP01 | CONNECTIVITY | Closed with self-help |
| #LTS00131337 | 2026-05-28 | 1.0 | OUTBOUND | VLP01 | CONNECTIVITY | Abandoned or vague |
| #LTS00131343 | 2026-05-28 | 3.0 | INBOUND | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Closed with self-help |
| #LTS00131349 | 2026-05-29 | 3.0 | INBOUND | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | ✓ Resolved |
| #LTS00131357 | 2026-05-29 | 1.0 | INBOUND | RE6250 | SETUP | Abandoned or vague |