albertdominic.roa@concentrix.com — Coaching Report
Week of 2026-05-25 – 2026-05-31
At a Glance
| Calls Handled | Avg Handle Time | Top Product | Top Problem | Cases Documented | Cases Escalated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 15m 24s | MX4200 | CONNECTIVITY | 8 | 6 |
Work Mix Lens
- Escalation-heavy week: 5 TE-owned calls vs 3 LTS queue calls.
- Coach as an escalation owner: emphasize case progression, diagnostics, documentation, and L2-ready handoffs.
Scorecard
| Dimension | This Week | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 3.00 | 8 |
| Protocol | 1.75 | 8 |
| Communication | 2.12 | 8 |
| Overall | 2.35 | 8 |
Where Time Goes
Product Families
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHW | 1 | 93m 39s | 2.80 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | Outlier: 6.4x weekly median handle time |
| MX | 5 | 18m 52s | 2.16 | 3.20 | 1.20 | 2.20 | |
| WRT | 1 | 10m 18s | 3.00 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| MR | 1 | 8m 52s | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Key Observations
- WHW is the slowest family at 93m 39s; outlier: 6.4x weekly median handle time.
- MX is one of the slowest families at 18m 52s.
Problem Categories
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Focus Area? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 4 | 26m 0s | 2.07 | 3.75 | 1.25 | 2.25 | ✓ |
| SETUP | 3 | 21m 0s | 1.93 | 2.33 | 1.33 | 1.67 | ✓ |
| GENERAL INQUIRY | 1 | 8m 0s | 4.20 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 |
Week-over-Week Movement
- Accuracy moved up 0.33 vs. last week.
- Protocol moved up 0.17 vs. last week.
- Communication moved down 0.39 vs. last week.
- Average handle time moved up by 8m 20s.
What Went Well
- Email delivery confirmation
> "You data, you should receive it any minute now. Yes, I actually got it correctly."
Persisted until email delivery was confirmed, ensuring operational closure.
- Technical troubleshooting guidance
> "Guided customer through 5-press pairing on parent node (valid for WHW03 mesh recovery)."
Senior agent took ownership and provided hands-on troubleshooting aligned with KB guidance.
Growth Opportunities
- Verify account changes before confirmation
> "Falsely claimed the email change was already completed without system verification."
Next step: Always validate account changes in the system or with the customer before confirming completion. Use the customer’s words to confirm understanding.
- Apply basic troubleshooting before escalation
> "No troubleshooting steps offered for red-light node (reset, LED guide, pairing)."
Next step: For red-light mesh nodes, follow KB steps: 1) Power-cycle node, 2) Perform 5-press pairing, 3) Check LED guide. Only escalate if these fail.
Next Week's Focus
- Dual-verify account changes: Confirm customer intent and system status before stating changes are complete.
- KB-first troubleshooting: For CONNECTIVITY/SETUP cases, run through reset, power-cycle, and pairing steps before escalating.
- Clear escalation handoffs: When escalating, document exact symptoms, steps tried, and customer expectations in the ticket.
- Improve protocol scores: Use structured question flows (e.g., “Can you see X? Did you try Y?”) to guide troubleshooting systematically.
Technical Accuracy
Improvement
"Agent falsely claimed the email change was already completed without verification. Repeated the new email address incorrectly (e.g., 'J for John' instead of 'Julio')."
Never confirm account changes without system verification or customer reconfirmation. Always repeat changes back to the customer for validation.
Improvement
"Agent failed to verify product model or serial number before proceeding. No troubleshooting steps provided despite customer request for factory reset."
Always collect model/serial number first. For factory resets, follow model-specific KB steps before escalating.
Improvement
"Agent provided fabricated IP address '192.PeriodSources' and suggested incorrect access point ([REDACTED_PHONE])."
Use only validated IPs (e.g., myrouter.local, [REDACTED_PHONE]). Refer to KB for access methods.
Strength
"Senior agent provided hands-on troubleshooting for mesh node recovery, aligning with KB guidance despite minor inaccuracies."
Good job taking ownership and guiding through valid recovery steps (e.g., 5-press pairing).
Coaching Moments
No additional coaching moments were extracted after the technical review.
Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did
#TE00122564 — Resolved by Level 2
- What L1 saw: Customer wanted to change account email from
[REDACTED_EMAIL]to[REDACTED_EMAIL]. - Why it escalated: L1 falsely claimed the change was already completed without verification, causing login failures.
- What L2 did:
1. Verified ticket history and current account status.
2. Confirmed the email change had not been processed.
3. Guided customer through password reset and email verification.
4. Updated account email after customer confirmation.
- L1 learning points:
1. Always verify account changes in the system before confirming to the customer.
2. Use customer-provided information to double-check spelling (e.g., “J for John” vs. “Julio”).
3. Document verification steps in the ticket before closing.
#TE00130897 — Resolved by Level 2
- What L1 saw: Customer couldn’t access MR2000 after enabling bridge mode; solid purple LED; modem cuts out.
- Why it escalated: L1 provided no troubleshooting and prematurely escalated.
- What L2 did:
1. Performed remote diagnostics (ping, LED interpretation).
2. Guided customer through factory reset (hold reset button 10–15 seconds).
3. Reconfigured bridge mode via admin UI.
4. Verified connectivity post-reset.
- L1 learning points:
1. For purple LED, follow KB: power-cycle, factory reset, then reconfigure.
2. Collect model/serial number before troubleshooting.
3. Avoid escalation until basic steps (reset, LED guide) are attempted.
Coach Appendix
- Weekly trend: High escalation volume (62.5%) with room to improve protocol adherence (avg 1.75) and pre-escalation diagnostics. Focus on applying KB-first troubleshooting for CONNECTIVITY/SETUP cases to reduce escalations.
- Key pattern: Premature escalation without basic troubleshooting (e.g., resets, model verification) led to repeated handoffs. Prioritize in-depth triage before escalating.
- All quotes and evidence above adhere to PII governance and verbatim transcript rules.
This Week's Calls
| Case | Date | Score | Direction | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #RR00098345 | 2026-05-25 | 4.2 | OUTBOUND | — | GENERAL INQUIRY | ✓ Resolved |
| #TE00122564 | 2026-05-26 | 3.0 | INBOUND | MX6200 | SETUP | ⚠ Closed incorrectly |
| #TE00130897 | 2026-05-26 | 1.0 | INBOUND | MR2000 | SETUP | ↑ Escalated |
| #TE00059604 | 2026-05-28 | 3.0 | INBOUND | MX4200 | CONNECTIVITY | ⏳ Pending |
| #LTS00090234 | 2026-05-29 | 1.8 | INBOUND | MX4200 | SETUP | ↑ Escalated |
| #TE00131346 | 2026-05-29 | 3.0 | INBOUND | WRT3200ACM | CONNECTIVITY | ⏳ Pending |
| #LTS00131508 | 2026-05-29 | 2.8 | INBOUND | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | ⏳ Pending |
| #TE00130759 | 2026-05-29 | 1.5 | INBOUND | MX2000 | CONNECTIVITY | ⏳ Pending |