john.pagurayan@concentrix.com — Coaching Report
Week of 2026-05-25 – 2026-05-31
At a Glance
| Calls Handled | Avg Handle Time | Top Product | Top Problem | Cases Documented | Cases Escalated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 53m 44s | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | 3 | — |
Work Mix Lens
- Frontline-heavy week: 3 LTS queue calls vs 0 TE-owned calls.
- Coach as a frontline agent: emphasize safe troubleshooting branches, closure hygiene, and clear customer-facing next steps.
Scorecard
| Dimension | This Week | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 3.00 | 3 |
| Protocol | 1.67 | 3 |
| Communication | 2.67 | 3 |
| Overall | 2.63 | 3 |
Where Time Goes
Product Families
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX | 1 | 110m 35s | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | Outlier: 2.5x weekly median handle time |
| MR | 1 | 44m 18s | 3.40 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | |
| EA | 1 | 6m 18s | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
Key Observations
- MX is the slowest family at 110m 35s; outlier: 2.5x weekly median handle time.
- MR is one of the slowest families at 44m 18s.
Problem Categories
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Focus Area? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 2 | 77m 26s | 3.20 | 3.50 | 2.00 | 3.00 | |
| ACCESS | 1 | 6m 18s | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | ✓ |
Week-over-Week Movement
- Overall moved up 0.58 vs. last week.
- Accuracy moved up 1.00 vs. last week.
- Protocol moved down 0.33 vs. last week.
- Communication moved up 1.17 vs. last week.
- Average handle time moved up by 11m 46s.
What Went Well
- Effective troubleshooting for connectivity issue
> Correctly diagnosed physical connectivity and performed proper sequential power-cycle (modem first, then router), which resolved the issue.
- Customer empathy and de-escalation
> Showed genuine empathy regarding the customer's limited income and health situation, de-escalating tension.
Growth Opportunities
- Premature escalation to paid support
What better looks like: Introduce paid support only after exhausting basic, free troubleshooting steps — especially for issues likely resolvable with simple actions.
> Introduced paid support at [08:00] before attempting any troubleshooting, despite the issue likely being resolvable with basic steps.
- Failure to collect critical product information
What better looks like: Always collect model and serial number within the first 30 seconds of the call to enable accurate diagnostics and avoid missteps.
> Failed to collect product model number, a critical omission for any technical support call.
Next Week's Focus
- Start every call by confirming model and serial number — this prevents misdiagnosis and ensures you have the right tools/KB articles ready.
- Reserve paid-support mentions for after basic troubleshooting — try power-cycles, cable checks, and simple UI steps first.
- Use approved remote tools only — avoid third-party platforms like Zoho unless explicitly authorized.
- Limit non-essential questioning — stay focused on steps that directly move toward resolution.
Technical Accuracy
Improvement
Failed to collect product model number, a critical omission for any technical support call.
Improvement
Incorrectly declared the device out of warranty without verification and prematurely escalated to paid support.
Improvement
Used non-standard remote access (Zoho) instead of approved Linksys remote tools.
Strength
Correctly diagnosed physical connectivity and performed proper sequential power-cycle (modem first, then router), which resolved the issue.
Coaching Moments
No additional coaching moments were extracted after the technical review.
Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did
No escalated case learning was available for this report.
Coach Appendix
- The week's most significant trend is the low protocol adherence combined with premature paid-support escalation, especially evident in the MX6200 and EA6350 cases. Focus next coaching on reinforcing structured troubleshooting flows and ensuring critical product data is captured early.
- Recurring pattern: failure to collect model/serial numbers and use of non-approved remote tools. These gaps directly impact resolution efficiency and customer trust.
This Week's Calls
| Case | Date | Score | Direction | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00113870 | 2026-05-26 14:59:04+00:00 | 1.5 | INBOUND | EA6350 | ACCESS | Agent promised email setup instructions, but none provided; customer remained unable to access router |
| #LTS00131145 | 2026-05-28 01:26:42+00:00 | 3.4 | INBOUND | MR7350 | CONNECTIVITY | ✓ Resolved |
| #LTS00073069 | 2026-05-29 01:03:17+00:00 | 3.0 | INBOUND | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | ✓ Likely resolved |