rubierosa.levi@concentrix.com — Coaching Report
Week of 2026-05-25 – 2026-05-31
At a Glance
| Calls Handled | Avg Handle Time | Top Product | Top Problem | Cases Documented | Cases Escalated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 26m 53s | MX2000 | ACCESS | 7 | 2 |
Work Mix Lens
- Frontline-heavy week: 5 LTS queue calls vs 2 TE-owned calls.
- Coach as a frontline agent: emphasize safe troubleshooting branches, closure hygiene, and clear customer-facing next steps.
Scorecard
| Dimension | This Week | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 1.57 | 7 |
| Protocol | 1.71 | 7 |
| Communication | 2.43 | 7 |
| Overall | 1.86 | 7 |
Where Time Goes
Product Families
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPN | 2 | 42m 42s | 2.10 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.50 | Outlier: 1.5x weekly median handle time |
| MBE | 1 | 37m 30s | 1.80 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | |
| MX | 3 | 18m 13s | 1.33 | 2.00 | 1.33 | 2.33 | |
| WHW | 1 | 10m 35s | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Key Observations
- SPN is the slowest family at 42m 42s; outlier: 1.5x weekly median handle time.
- MBE is one of the slowest families at 37m 30s.
Problem Categories
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Focus Area? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACCESS | 3 | 34m 18s | 1.47 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.33 | ✓ |
| SETUP | 1 | 35m 11s | 1.10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | ✓ |
| CONNECTIVITY | 2 | 6m 48s | 2.25 | 3.00 | 1.50 | 2.50 | |
| HARDWARE | 1 | 36m 26s | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 |
Week-over-Week Movement
- Accuracy moved down 0.55 vs. last week.
- Protocol moved up 0.21 vs. last week.
- Communication moved up 0.43 vs. last week.
- Average handle time moved up by 12m 42s.
- Family swing: SPN handle time moved up by 22m 01s vs. last week.
- Family swing: MX handle time moved up by 8m 40s vs. last week.
What Went Well
- Clear communication under pressure
> "Yes, sir, that's good. Is, like, for example, um, the child node upstairs will connect to the child node downstairs, cuz, uh, that's in between, sir."
Consistently maintained polite, patient tone even when addressing complex mesh topology questions.
- Effective ticket documentation
All 7 calls resulted in documented HappyFox cases with complete model/serial collection where applicable, ensuring continuity for follow-up.
Growth Opportunities
- Technical accuracy in model-specific guidance
> "Provided wrong admin URL ([REDACTED_PHONE] - KB states [REDACTED_PHONE] or http://myrouter.info for SPNM)"
Next step: Before instructing login access, verify model-specific admin URLs in KB (e.g., SPNM42 uses http://myrouter.info, MX6200 uses https://[REDACTED_PHONE]).
- Protocol adherence for hardware issues
> "Did not collect product model, serial number, or warranty information — a fundamental protocol failure for hardware troubleshooting."
Next step: Always collect model, serial, and warranty status within the first 2 minutes of hardware-related calls to enable accurate support pathing.
Next Week's Focus
- Model-specific verification: Cross-check KB for admin URLs, reset procedures, and pairing commands before guiding customers – especially for SPN/MX series.
- Early information gathering: Script model/serial/warranty collection for all hardware and access issues in the first 3 minutes of the call.
- Escalation readiness: When hitting technical limits (e.g., error 2123), document exact symptoms, collect sysinfo/logs, and hand off with clear L2-ready notes.
- Closure hygiene: For unresolved cases, set explicit follow-up expectations (e.g., "I’ll email the KB article by EOD; please reply with results") and update HappyFox status accordingly.
Technical Accuracy
Improvement
"Agent provided incorrect admin URL for SPNM42 router, leading to unresolved access issue."
Used [REDACTED_PHONE] instead of model-specific http://myrouter.info – caused 48-minute call without resolution.
Improvement
"Agent provided incorrect wiring topology for MX2000 setup, leading to unresolved connectivity issue."
Instructed MX2000 WAN → Asus LAN (creates double-NAT) instead of WAN → modem/ONT per KB universal_isp_compatibility.md.
Improvement
"Agent provided false technical explanation for error 2123, reflecting severe misunderstanding."
Claimed error was due to “merchant file with invalid syntax” – no such component or error cause exists in Linksys systems.
Coaching Moments
No additional coaching moments were extracted after the technical review.
Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did
#TE00130835 — Resolved by Level 2
- What L1 saw: Customer couldn’t log into Linksys app admin despite correct password; SPNM42 router with solid blue LED but app showed “incorrect password”.
- Why it escalated: L1 provided invalid admin URLs (myrouter.local, [REDACTED_PHONE]) and incorrect reset procedure (20s press vs KB 10s).
- What L2 did:
- Verified correct admin URL (http://myrouter.info)
- Guided through proper 10s reset with pink light confirmation
- Confirmed warranty status and offered replacement if unresolved
- Current state: Resolved after callback and password reset confirmation.
- L1 learning points:
1. Always use model-specific admin URLs – SPNM42 ≠ MX6200.
2. Reset duration must match KB (10s for SPNM, not 20s).
3. Confirm LED states match expected behavior before declaring “invalid password”.
#TE00130994 — Resolved by Level 2
- What L1 saw: MX6200 showing error 2123 in app, zero devices online despite solid blue node LEDs.
- Why it escalated: L1 insisted on node restart without logging app behavior or addressing customer’s request for log review.
- What L2 did:
- Requested sysinfo logs via email
- Explained error 2123 often indicates cloud service discontinuity (Linksys Smart WiFi sunset)
- Guided through manual log collection and analysis
- Current state: Resolved after logs confirmed cloud service issue; customer retained local access.
- L1 learning points:
1. For error 2123, collect app logs before suggesting resets.
2. Acknowledge customer requests for developer review – offer log collection paths.
3. MX6200 may require local UI access (myrouter.local) if cloud services are discontinued.
Coach Appendix
Highest-signal trend: Persistent technical inaccuracies in model-specific guidance (URLs, resets, error explanations) caused extended handle times and unresolved issues. Prioritize KB verification for SPN/MX series before customer interaction. Protocol gaps in early information gathering (model/serial/warranty) also contributed to escalation volume. Focus next week on structured model-specific checklists and escalation documentation standards.
This Week's Calls
| Case | Date | Score | Direction | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00130689 | 2026-05-25 07:07:09+00:00 | 1.10 | OUTBOUND | MX2000 | SETUP | Customer chose to abandon attempt; no functional configuration achieved. |
| #LTS00130692 | 2026-05-25 08:26:44+00:00 | 1.80 | INBOUND | MBE7000 | ACCESS | Agent promised to email an OpenWRT article; no technical resolution achieved. |
| #TE00130835 | 2026-05-26 10:02:29+00:00 | 1.20 | INBOUND | SPNMX42 | ACCESS | No resolution achieved. Recommend escalation to senior support for correct admin login procedure and warranty verification. |
| #TE00130994 | 2026-05-27 02:31:35+00:00 | 1.40 | INBOUND | MX6200 | ACCESS | None – agent insisted on node restart despite refusal and provided no alternative path. Failed to acknowledge or act on customer's request to have app logs reviewed by developers. |
| #LTS00130683 | 2026-05-27 06:48:13+00:00 | 1.50 | OUTBOUND | MX2001SH | CONNECTIVITY | No resolution. Agent advised customer to call back if further assistance is needed. |
| #LTS00131014 | 2026-05-27 10:13:33+00:00 | 3.00 | INBOUND | SPNM62CF | HARDWARE | Advised customer to contact Community Fiber ISP support; provided two hotline numbers. |
| #LTS00131363 | 2026-05-29 02:56:49+00:00 | 3.00 | INBOUND | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Sent KB article via email; customer may call back for paid support if article fails. No technical fix applied. |