eric.marbella@concentrix.com — Coaching Report
Week of 2026-06-01 – 2026-06-07
At a Glance
| Calls Handled | Avg Handle Time | Top Product | Top Problem | Cases Documented | Cases Escalated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 38m 4s | MX6200 | GENERAL INQUIRY | 6 | 5 |
Work Mix Lens
- Escalation-heavy week: 7 TE-owned calls vs 0 LTS queue calls.
- Coach as an escalation owner: emphasize case progression, diagnostics, documentation, and L2-ready handoffs.
Scorecard
| Dimension | This Week | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 2.50 | 14 |
| Protocol | 1.10 | 14 |
| Communication | 2.10 | 14 |
| Overall | 2.00 | 14 |
Where Time Goes
Product Families
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX | 9 | 49m 16s | 1.97 | 2.56 | 1.33 | 2.22 | |
| WHW | 1 | 38m 18s | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Key Observations
- MX is one of the slowest families at 49m 16s.
- WHW is one of the slowest families at 38m 18s.
Problem Categories
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Avg Overall | Avg Accuracy | Avg Protocol | Avg Communication | Focus Area? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENERAL INQUIRY | 5 | 21m 4s | 2.10 | 3.20 | 1.20 | 2.20 | |
| CONNECTIVITY | 3 | 58m 4s | 1.30 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.70 | ✓ |
| SETUP | 3 | 52m 13s | 1.80 | 2.30 | 1.30 | 2.30 | ✓ |
| HARDWARE | 1 | 56m 5s | 1.80 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | ✓ |
| ACCESS | 2 | 46m 33s | 2.30 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
Week-over-Week Movement
- Accuracy moved up 0.27 vs. last week.
- Average handle time moved down by 1m 27s.
- Family swing: MX handle time moved up by 14m 36s vs. last week.
What Went Well
- Clear communication in refund process
> "Thank you again for answering my call. And would there be anything else that I can assist you with, aside from your main concern?"
- Persistence in troubleshooting guidance
> "Okay, so before we, before we proceed. So you got a new modem and then also a router from them?"
Growth Opportunities
- Protocol adherence and case documentation
> "Did not collect product model or serial number despite clear hardware entitlement issue."
- Technical accuracy and troubleshooting
> "Agent used unauthorized third-party remote access tool, violating security protocol."
Next Week's Focus
- Collect essential product details (model, serial number) on every call.
- Verify warranty status before discussing replacement options.
- Use only approved Linksys tools for remote access.
- Document all troubleshooting steps and outcomes in HappyFox.
Technical Accuracy
- Improvement
> "Agent failed to collect product model and serial number despite critical relevance to replacement verification. No warranty status or case documentation was performed."
- Improvement
> "Agent used unauthorized third-party remote access tool, violating security protocol. Misidentified LED colors and provided incorrect IP address behavior guidance."
- Improvement
> "Agent provided incorrect support URL and misstated brand name, undermining technical credibility and protocol adherence."
- Improvement
> "Agent provided incorrect support URL and misstated company name, violating accuracy and protocol. No troubleshooting or valid support path was provided."
- Improvement
> "Agent failed to provide accurate support information, violating protocol and leaving the customer misdirected."
Coaching Moments
No additional coaching moments were extracted after the technical review.
Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did
#PR00132341 — Pending with Level 2
- What L1 saw: Customer received a used MX6201 replacement unit and wanted a brand-new one. L1 failed to collect product details, verify warranty, or open a case.
- Why it escalated: Lack of documentation and unclear next steps.
- Related call chain: Multiple calls involving the same issue, with inconsistent handling and no resolution.
- What L2 did: Pending HQ feedback; no resolution steps documented yet.
- Current state: Pending with Level 2.
- L1 learning points: Always collect model/serial numbers, verify warranty, and document all interactions in HappyFox.
#TE00131245 — Callback
- What L1 saw: MX8500 node disconnected, showing solid red light. L1 attempted remote session via unauthorized tool and escalated.
- Why it escalated: Need for firmware retrieval and possible replacement.
- Related call chain: Multiple calls involving the same issue, with inconsistent handling.
- What L2 did: Claimed case, attempted to retrieve latest firmware, and scheduled callback.
- Current state: Callback.
- L1 learning points: Use approved remote tools, verify LED states correctly, and document all troubleshooting steps.
#TE00131380 — Resolved
- What L1 saw: MX4000 unable to access web UI, showing blank blue screen. L1 escalated after failed troubleshooting.
- Why it escalated: Unable to resolve blank screen issue.
- Related call chain: Single call involving the issue.
- What L2 did: Tested firmware downgrade on lab unit and provided workaround.
- Current state: Resolved.
- L1 learning points: Try accessing admin interface via full UI path if default address fails.
#TE00132021 — Resolved
- What L1 saw: MX4200 no internet connection after ISP upgrade. L1 scheduled callback without troubleshooting.
- Why it escalated: No resolution achieved.
- Related call chain: Multiple calls involving the same issue.
- What L2 did: Performed remote troubleshooting and resolved the issue.
- Current state: Resolved.
- L1 learning points: Perform basic network diagnostics (ipconfig, admin page) before scheduling callbacks.
#TE00125022 — Resolved
- What L1 saw: WHW01 child node disconnected after outage. L1 advised contacting ISP and abruptly ended the call.
- Why it escalated: No resolution achieved.
- Related call chain: Single call involving the issue.
- What L2 did: Resolved the issue and provided feedback.
- Current state: Resolved.
- L1 learning points: Provide clear troubleshooting steps and avoid abrupt call endings.
Coach Appendix
- Highest-signal weekly trend: Protocol adherence and technical accuracy need significant improvement, particularly in collecting product details, using approved tools, and providing accurate support information.
- Recurring pattern: Multiple calls show inconsistent handling of hardware and connectivity issues, with a lack of documentation and unclear next steps.
This Week's Calls
| Case | Date | Score | Direction | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #PR00132341 | 2026-06-02 00:36:01+00:00 | 1.80 | INBOUND | — | HARDWARE | Agent promised to call back within 30-60 minutes after internal follow-up, but no case was opened or details captured. |
| #TE00131245 | 2026-06-02 00:36:48+00:00 | 2.00 | OUTBOUND | MX8500 | CONNECTIVITY | Escalated to engineering for firmware retrieval and possible replacement; follow-up to be scheduled via email/phone. |
| #PR00132341 | 2026-06-02 02:47:15+00:00 | 2.20 | OUTBOUND | MX6200 | GENERAL INQUIRY | Agent explained warranty policy but provided no actionable resolution or escalation contact. Customer remains dissatisfied with no next step. |
| #TE00131380 | 2026-06-02 20:47:52+00:00 | 2.20 | OUTBOUND | MX4000 | ACCESS | Agent will test firmware downgrade on lab unit and schedule follow-up call tomorrow after 2 PM CST. |
| #PR00132341 | 2026-06-03 18:41:03+00:00 | 2.80 | INBOUND | MX6200 | GENERAL INQUIRY | Escalated to higher management; follow‑up to be made within 24‑48 business hours. |
| #TE00132021 | 2026-06-03 19:44:14+00:00 | 1.60 | OUTBOUND | MX4200 | SETUP | Schedule callback for tomorrow (9:00–9:30 AM) to perform full troubleshooting. |
| #TE00132021 | 2026-06-04 17:40:21+00:00 | 1.80 | OUTBOUND | MX4200 | SETUP | Customer instructed to rewire parent node to modem; no confirmation of success obtained, and no further steps provided. |
| #TE00132021 | 2026-06-04 17:48:05+00:00 | 2.10 | OUTBOUND | MX4200 | SETUP | Customer to verify WAN connectivity on the parent node, confirm DHCP address, and re-add child nodes using proper pairing method (pair button for Velop); if still failing, schedule a technician or consider warranty replacement. |
| #PR00132341 | 2026-06-04 20:05:03+00:00 | 1.00 | INBOUND | — | GENERAL INQUIRY | None – call ended without any action. |
| #PR00132341 | 2026-06-04 20:09:21+00:00 | 3.70 | OUTBOUND | — | GENERAL INQUIRY | Escalated to Customer Service for refund processing; customer to be contacted within 24‑48 business hours. |
| #PR00005769 | 2026-06-04 22:10:18+00:00 | 1.10 | OUTBOUND | — | SETUP | Vague promise of email and callback; no verified resolution path established. |
| #PR00132341 | 2026-06-04 22:59:26+00:00 | 1.60 | OUTBOUND | MX6201 | GENERAL INQUIRY | Customer Service to call customer within 24–48 business hours with exact refund amount; customer will then decide to return or keep the device. |
| #PR00132341 | 2026-06-05 00:03:47+00:00 | 2.20 | OUTBOUND | — | GENERAL INQUIRY | Serial number recorded, but no further action, escalation path, or follow-up expectation communicated. |
| #TE00125022 | 2026-06-05 21:04:57+00:00 | 1.00 | INBOUND | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | No resolution achieved; agent advised contacting ISP despite customer confirmation of restored service, then abruptly ended call without follow-up. |
| #TE00131245 | 2026-06-06 01:21:29+00:00 | 1.40 | OUTBOUND | MX8500 | CONNECTIVITY | Escalated to higher management; promised email update within 24–48 hours. |