xiangjie.zhang@concentrix.com — Coaching Report

Week of 2026-06-01 – 2026-06-07


At a Glance

Calls HandledAvg Handle TimeTop ProductTop ProblemCases DocumentedCases Escalated
812m 22sMBE7000CONNECTIVITY5

Work Mix Lens

Scorecard

DimensionThis WeekCalls Reviewed
Accuracy2.206
Protocol1.606
Communication1.506
Overall1.866

Where Time Goes

Product Families

FamilyCallsAvg Handle TimeAvg OverallAvg AccuracyAvg ProtocolAvg CommunicationNote
MBE424m 5s1.901.501.501.00Outlier: 1.7x weekly median handle time
MR221m 6s1.101.001.002.00
EA17m 51s2.604.002.002.00
MX24m 56s1.852.501.501.50

Key Observations

Problem Categories

CategoryCallsAvg Handle TimeAvg OverallAvg AccuracyAvg ProtocolAvg CommunicationFocus Area?
CONNECTIVITY414m 10s1.833.001.501.50
SETUP325m 32s
ACCESS15m 42s1.901.002.002.00

Week-over-Week Movement

What Went Well

Growth Opportunities

Next Week's Focus

Technical Accuracy

Improvement

Agent provided materially incorrect and potentially unsafe URLs (linksysmallwaza.com, smallwifi.com) during the MX5300 call, which are not official Linksys domains and contradict KB guidance.

Improvement

Agent gave incorrect PPPoE-skip guidance for a fiber/DHCP connection during the MR7500 call, violating KB protocol.

Improvement

Agent failed to provide the correct admin URL (http://[REDACTED_PHONE] or http://myrouter.local) for the EA9300 router, a core protocol step per KB.

Improvement

Agent did not create or reference a HappyFox case in multiple calls (e.g., MX5300, MX6200), violating case management protocol and leaving customers without follow-up paths.

Strength

Agent correctly identified potential WPA3/WPA2 and wireless protocol incompatibility during the EA9300 call, aligning with KB guidance for legacy device setup.

Coaching Moments

No additional coaching moments were extracted after the technical review.

Escalation Lessons: What L2 Did

No escalated case learning was available for this report.

Coach Appendix

Weekly pattern unavailable.

Focus points: Case management and follow-up protocol adherence; Technical accuracy and KB adherence; Communication clarity and filler reduction

This Week's Calls

CaseDateScoreDirectionProductCategoryOutcome
#LTS001315422026-06-01 06:08:27+00:001.90INBOUNDMX5300ACCESSNone provided; agent promised to send software later but gave no concrete follow-up regarding the announcement or email communication.
#LTS001317402026-06-02 01:04:37+00:002.80INBOUNDMBE7000SETUPNode added successfully; monitor signal and placement. No further action required.
#LTS001317612026-06-02 03:04:12+00:002.60INBOUNDEA9300CONNECTIVITYCustomer to obtain a computer or tablet and call back for step-by-step web-UI configuration.
#LTS001317772026-06-02 05:53:27+00:00INBOUNDMR8300CONNECTIVITY
#LTS001319872026-06-03 04:47:28+00:001.10INBOUNDMR7500CONNECTIVITYAgent promised to email steps and asked the customer to call back if the problem persisted—no resolution or validated fix provided.
#LTS001321742026-06-03 10:14:36+00:001.00INBOUNDMBE7000SETUPNone
#LTS001321742026-06-04 02:28:41+00:00INBOUNDMBE7000SETUP
#LTS001321912026-06-04 08:53:06+00:001.80INBOUNDMX6200CONNECTIVITYNo resolution or concrete next step provided. Customer left to decide independently.
#LTS001323622026-06-05 03:54:43+00:00INBOUNDMBE7000CONNECTIVITY