1Calls
1.80Avg Score
3m 12sAvg Handle Time
1Documented
0Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.8 | 1 |
| Technical Accuracy | 5.0 | 1 |
| Protocol | 1.0 | 1 |
| Communication | 1.0 | 1 |
Main focus: Call Engagement Protocol
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
No v2 shadow-grading data available for this week.
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHW | 1 | 3m 12s | 1.8 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 1 | 3m 12s | 1.8 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ✓ |
What You Did Well
- Accuracy Excellence1 of 1 callsDelivered perfect accuracy (score 5) by providing technically correct information during the CONNECTIVITY issue resolution for WHW03, though engagement was limited.Why this matters: Maintains technical credibility and reduces risk of misguidance, even in brief interactions.
Growth Focus
- Call Engagement Protocol1 of 1 callsFailed to transition from automated script to active support, leaving customer's modem/router confusion unaddressed and callback request unconfirmed across the single CONNECTIVITY call (#LTS00103689).Why this matters: Risk of customer frustration, repeat calls, and compliance violations when support is not acknowledged.Example: Agent did not respond after initial greeting or acknowledge callback request at [03:00], resulting in abandoned call.What better looks like: After script, actively greet customer, confirm understanding of issue, and document all requests (e.g., callback times).
- Case Documentation Completeness1 of 1 callsDid not collect required case information (model, serial, contact details) or initiate troubleshooting despite clear customer inquiry in the WHW03 CONNECTIVITY call (#LTS00103689).Why this matters: Incomplete documentation prevents effective escalation or follow-up, increasing resolution time.Example: Agent ended call without gathering serial number or attempting basic connectivity troubleshooting.What better looks like: Collect model, serial, and contact details within first 30 seconds; initiate at least one troubleshooting step before closing.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
No documentation mismatches detected this week.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Collect device model, serial number, and contact details within the first 30 seconds of every call.Why: Prevents escalation delays and ensures continuity if follow-up is needed.
- Step 2After initial script, actively acknowledge the customer's issue and confirm understanding before proceeding.Why: Builds trust and reduces risk of missed customer concerns.This week: #LTS00103689
- Step 3Initiation at least one troubleshooting step or knowledge base reference before closing any technical inquiry.Why: Ensures basic support is provided and reduces abandoned call perception.This week: #LTS00103689
- Step 4Document all customer requests (e.g., callback times, preferred contact methods) explicitly in case notes.Why: Creates clear handoff for callbacks and reduces miscommunication risk.This week: #LTS00103689
Escalation Lessons
No escalated case learning this week.
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00103689INBOUND | 2026-06-20 | 1.8 A 5P 1C 1 | — | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | None – agent did not respond to customer after initial greeting. |