26Calls
2.12Avg Score
13m 20sAvg Handle Time
21Documented
0Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2.12 | 26 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.12 | 26 |
| Protocol | 1.58 | 26 |
| Communication | 2.15 | 26 |
Main focus: Incomplete troubleshooting
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 32.05% across 22 v2-scored calls this week7 auto-zeros
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 1.56 |
| Technical Accuracy | 1.59 |
| Communication | 2.67 |
| Customer Ownership | 2.35 |
| Escalation Judgment | 2.86 |
| Customer Experience | 1.43 |
- Unresolved: 13
- Partial Resolution: 5
- Ownership Gap: 2
- Successful Resolution: 2
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LN | 1 | 24m 38s | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | Outlier: 2.9x weekly median handle time |
| WHW | 4 | 24m 02s | 1.97 | 2.0 | 1.75 | 2.0 | Outlier: 2.8x weekly median handle time |
| MBE | 3 | 23m 31s | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.33 | 1.67 | Outlier: 2.8x weekly median handle time |
| MX | 3 | 16m 12s | 2.27 | 2.33 | 2.0 | 2.67 | Outlier: 1.9x weekly median handle time |
| MR | 5 | 8m 32s | 2.32 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.6 | |
| SPN | 2 | 8m 21s | 3.2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| E | 4 | 7m 04s | 2.55 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.75 | |
| EA | 1 | 6m 29s | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| WRT | 1 | 3m 08s | 1.8 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 10 | 18m 23s | 1.59 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 2.5 | ✓ |
| SETUP | 6 | 23m 07s | 1.83 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | ✓ |
| ACCESS | 5 | 15m 45s | 2.36 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 2.8 |
What You Did Well
- Professional communication8 of 21 callsMaintained a polite and professional tone throughout interactions across 8 of your calls, such as in #LTS00133409 where you acknowledged customer frustration and provided clear next steps.Why this matters: Builds trust and reduces customer effort, increasing satisfaction and likelihood of successful self-help.
- Accurate device identification7 of 21 callsCorrectly identified product models and provided accurate technical details, such as in #LTS00133409 where you identified the MX4200 model and supplied correct local IP addresses per KB guidance.Why this matters: Ensures correct troubleshooting and prevents misdirected support, improving first-call resolution.
Growth Focus
- Incomplete troubleshooting9 of 21 callsSkipped essential diagnostics such as WAN status checks and LED interpretation in connectivity issues, appearing in 9 of your calls like #LTS00133409 where no WAN cable verification was performed before resetting the router.Why this matters: Leads to unresolved issues, repeat calls, and increased customer effort due to missed root causes.Example: In #LTS00133409, the agent reset the MX4200 without checking WAN port LED or modem status, causing the issue to remain unresolved.What better looks like: Always verify WAN cable connection, power cycle the modem, and check WAN port LED before proceeding to factory resets or reconfigurations.
- Incorrect technical guidance5 of 21 callsProvided materially incorrect instructions such as invalid mesh compatibility claims and unsupported pairing methods, seen in #LTS00133422 where MX5300 and MBE7000 compatibility was incorrectly confirmed.Why this matters: Results in failed customer attempts, damaged equipment, and loss of credibility.Example: In #LTS00133422, advising the customer to use the app to add an MBE7000 node to an MX5300 mesh caused the node to remain unpaired and unreachable.What better looks like: Refer to KB documentation for mesh compatibility (e.g., velop_mesh_compatibility.md) and use the correct 5-press or Pair button method for node addition.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
#LTS00133409HIGH
Grader saw: Unresolved
Grader marked issue unresolved (customer still needed ISP testing) while agent documented no troubleshooting steps and ended with self-help advice only.
#LTS00133422HIGH
Grader saw: Unresolved
Agent documented: Case Ticket: [REDACTED] ... Registration Link provided
Agent documented registration link and closed ticket, but grader noted fundamental mesh incompatibility was not addressed and issue remained unresolved.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Before closing any connectivity call, always verify WAN cable connection, power cycle the modem, and check WAN port LED status.Why: Skipping these steps leads to unresolved issues and repeat calls due to missed ISP or modem problems.
- Step 2Consult mesh compatibility KB articles before advising node addition or role changes, and use the correct 5-press or Pair button method based on model.Why: Incorrect guidance can render devices unusable and damage customer trust.This week: #LTS00133422
- Step 3When providing factory reset instructions, always state the exact duration specified in KB (e.g., 10-15 seconds for LN1100) and avoid non-KB terms like 'recovery reset'.Why: Inaccurate reset durations increase customer effort and risk bricking devices.This week: #LTS00133566
- Step 4Collect and verify model number and serial number on every call, and confirm warranty status before discussing paid support options.Why: Prevents misapplication of warranty policies and ensures accurate support eligibility.
- Step 5After guiding a reset or reconfiguration, always ask the customer to confirm the fix on the call (e.g., 'Can you see solid blue now?') before ending.Why: Ensures resolution is validated and reduces callbacks for unresolved issues.This week: #LTS00133738
Escalation Lessons
No escalated case learning this week.
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00133409INBOUND | 2026-06-15 | 2.9 A 4P 2C 3 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MX4200 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer advised to use web interface for setup; offered paid support or free self-help via support.linksys.com. Customer will call back after Verizon testing. |
| #LTS00133418INBOUND | 2026-06-15 | 1.7 A 1P 1C 3 | 57.0% Needs Improvement | MR8300 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer declined paid support and terminated the call without attempting troubleshooting. Directed to consider purchasing new router models. |
| #LTS00133422INBOUND | 2026-06-15 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 21.7% Needs Improvement | MBE7000 | SETUP | None provided. Call ended without resolution or clear next steps. |
| #LTS00133438INBOUND | 2026-06-15 | 3.2 A 5P 2C 3 | 43.5% Needs Improvement | MR9600 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer advised to reconnect TV to Wi-Fi or contact TV manufacturer for further assistance. |
| #LTS00133566INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 1.8 A 1P 1C 3 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | LN1100 | ACCESS | Perform a correct hardware factory reset (10-15 second hold) with child nodes off, then reconfigure the router and re-add nodes. Call back if issue persists. |
| #LTS00133570INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 69.6% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent incorrectly declared issue resolved. Correct next step: Use Pair button on parent node (KB: Section C) or web UI (http://192.168.1.1) to re-add child nodes. |
| #LTS00133575INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 1.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 54.5% Needs Improvement | MX2000 | ACCESS | No resolution achieved. Recommend sending customer KB link for enabling separate SSIDs and follow up if needed. |
| #GI00133564INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | CONNECTIVITY | Call ended without resolution; customer advised to reconnect with prior agent. | |
| #LTS00133575OUTBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 2.1 A 2P 2C 3 | 80.6% Developing | MX2000 | ACCESS | SSID change applied but not validated. No clear next steps provided. |
| #LTS00133585INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 3 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MR8300 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer instructed to attempt wired connection or password change; no follow-up confirmed. |
| #LTS00133422INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 1.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 36.9% Needs Improvement | MBE7000 | SETUP | Customer advised to verify WAN port LED and modem connection; if still no internet, schedule further support or consider hardware replacement. |
| #LTS00133597INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 2.8 A 1P 1C 2 | 28.5% Needs Improvement | E5400 | SETUP | Customer will arrange for a third-party technician to install the router; no further action taken by agent. |
| #LTS00133613INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 1.8 A 5P 1C 1 | — | E5400 | CONNECTIVITY | None – call ended with no actionable information. |
| #LTS00133613INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 2 | 59.9% Needs Improvement | E5400 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer will attempt a factory reset; agent provided link to support article. |
| #GI00133623INBOUND | 2026-06-16 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | EA8450 | ACCESS | Suggested factory reset with no instructions; no confirmation of action; no KB article, email, or follow-up provided. |
| #LTS00133737INBOUND | 2026-06-17 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 49.2% Needs Improvement | E2500 | CONNECTIVITY | Advised replacement of the out-of-warranty EA7400 router; no technical fix applied. |
| #LTS00133738INBOUND | 2026-06-17 | 4 A 4P 3C 4 | 76.9% Developing | WHW03 | ACCESS | Mesh network fully restored; advised customer to use Linksys Smart Wi-Fi app for renaming or advanced configuration |
| #LTS00133884INBOUND | 2026-06-18 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 33.5% Needs Improvement | MBE7000 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent instructed customer to perform factory reset and monitor nodes; no RMA/refund process initiated. |
| #LTS00133925INBOUND | 2026-06-18 | 1.6 A 2P 2C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | No technical resolution achieved; customer declined $15 paid support and ended call. Directed to self-help resources but no specific guidance provided. |
| #LTS00133937INBOUND | 2026-06-18 | 3.6 A 4P 4C 3 | — | SPNM60TB | ACCESS | Access the router via a web browser at http://myrouter.info to configure and add mesh nodes. |
| #LTS00120019INBOUND | 2026-06-19 | 1.8 A 5P 1C 2 | — | WRT54G2 | CONNECTIVITY | No action taken; call ended without resolution. |
| #LTS00134051INBOUND | 2026-06-19 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 3 | 60.8% Needs Improvement | SPNM60CF | CONNECTIVITY | Advised customer to contact Community Fibre ISP for WAN line investigation. |
| 14990180-6c03-11f1-ad95-42010a623f91INBOUND | 2026-06-19 | 2.8 A 3P 1C 2 | — | SETUP | Customer confirmed router is now functional; no further action required. | |
| 37021cf0-6c1e-11f1-a736-42010a62006fINBOUND | 2026-06-19 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MR7500 | SETUP | No technical fix provided. Agent offered paid support which was declined. Customer advised to contact printer support. |
| #LTS00114364INBOUND | 2026-06-19 | 1.3 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | None – agent gave inaccurate information and did not provide a supervisor or sales contact. |
| #LTS00060553INBOUND | 2026-06-19 | 2.8 A 1P 1C 2 | 32.8% Needs Improvement | MR75MS | CONNECTIVITY | Agent will email customer a guide on how to separate the 2.4 GHz band (self-help). |