1Calls
1.40Avg Score
59m 28sAvg Handle Time
1Documented
0Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.4 | 1 |
| Technical Accuracy | 1.0 | 1 |
| Protocol | 1.0 | 1 |
| Communication | 2.0 | 1 |
Main focus: Compliance violations
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 0.0% across 1 v2-scored calls this week1 auto-zero
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 2.19 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.19 |
| Communication | 2.5 |
| Customer Ownership | 4.0 |
| Escalation Judgment | — |
| Customer Experience | 1.79 |
- Unresolved: 1
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX | 1 | 59m 28s | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 1 | 59m 28s | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | ✓ |
What You Did Well
- Interference mitigation1 of 1 callsIdentified potential 2.4 GHz interference as a contributing factor and changed the 2.4 GHz channel to 11, aligning with best practices for reducing interference across the single call handled this week.Why this matters: Reducing Wi-Fi congestion improves customer connectivity and satisfaction by minimizing signal overlap.
- ISP Wi-Fi disable1 of 1 callsSuggested disabling the ISP modem’s Wi-Fi as a valid mitigation step for reducing 2.4 GHz congestion, demonstrated in the only call this week.Why this matters: This step helps isolate and resolve congestion issues, improving network performance for the customer.
Growth Focus
- Compliance violations1 of 1 callsProvided materially incorrect technical guidance by directing the customer to a nonexistent 'CA' page and form, and instructed them to fill out a fabricated legal form with false statements, violating compliance standards in the only call this week.Why this matters: Such actions risk legal exposure, damage customer trust, and violate company policy, potentially leading to disciplinary action.Example: In ticket #GI00012992, the agent directed the customer to complete a fake California legal form with false declarations, resulting in a critical compliance failure.What better looks like: Verify all guidance against KB articles and avoid instructing customers to complete any legal documents without explicit legal team approval.
- Missing customer data1 of 1 callsFailed to collect product model, serial number, and warranty status early in the call, hindering efficient troubleshooting and documentation.Why this matters: Missing baseline information delays diagnosis, increases resolution time, and may lead to unresolved issues or repeat calls.Example: On #GI00012992, the agent began troubleshooting without confirming the MX2000 model or warranty status, leading to incomplete documentation.What better looks like: Collect product model, serial number, and warranty status within the first 2 minutes of every call as per protocol.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
No documentation mismatches detected this week.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Collect product model, serial number, and warranty status within the first 2 minutes of every call.Why: Missing baseline information delays diagnosis and increases the risk of unresolved issues or repeat calls.This week: #GI00012992
- Step 2Verify all guidance against KB articles before providing instructions, especially for legal or regulatory matters.Why: Unverified guidance can lead to compliance violations, customer harm, and potential legal exposure.This week: #GI00012992
- Step 3Never use placeholder or fake contact information; always provide accurate and verified details.Why: Fake information erodes trust and may lead to failed follow-ups or escalation.This week: #GI00012992
Escalation Lessons
No escalated case learning this week.
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #GI00012992INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 1.4 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MX2000 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer to monitor nodes and call back if issues persist. No valid self-help path or confirmed resolution provided. |