Coaching Summary
Performance this week shows a need for improvement, with an average overall score of 2.2 and unresolved cases due to incomplete troubleshooting.
Inconsistent application of troubleshooting protocols led to skipped steps, misdirected customer guidance, and unresolved issues.
Key calls: #LTS00134890, #GI00134898
Risk Flags
Call had accuracy score 1 and protocol score 1, both below threshold.
Correct behavior: Follow KB troubleshooting steps for hardware faults and use correct referral paths per universal_support_contacts.md.
Impact: Customer was misdirected and received no valid assistance, leading to frustration and unresolved issue.
Related: #GI00134898
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2.2 | 2 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.5 | 2 |
| Protocol | 1.5 | 2 |
| Communication | 2.5 | 2 |
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 8.34% across 2 v2-scored calls this week1 auto-zero
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 0.0 |
| Technical Accuracy | 1.88 |
| Communication | 1.25 |
| Customer Ownership | 0.0 |
| Escalation Judgment | — |
| Customer Experience | 0.0 |
- Unresolved: 2
Score Diagnostics
Based on 2 calls reviewed this week.
Technical Findings
Call Handling Findings
- Incomplete troubleshooting stepsSystematically complete all steps in the Velop connectivity flowchart, including modem-direct speed tests and router dashboard WAN checks, before concluding device-level issues.
- Misguided customer referralsRefer customers to the correct support channels per KB (e.g., support.linksys.com for self-help or paid support) and provide model-specific troubleshooting resources before suggesting external contacts.
Calibration Notes
None recorded this week.
Callback Chains
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Mismatches
No documentation mismatches found.
Suggested Coaching Conversation
Coaching Best Practices
Five Principles for Effective Coaching Conversations
- SBI feedback model — Describe the Situation, the Behavior you observed, and its Impact. Avoid labels (“you always…”) — describe the specific instance.
- Ask more than you tell — Start with “What did you notice on that call?” before offering your interpretation. Agents who self-diagnose retain more.
- Recognition before correction — Open with a genuine strength observation. Agents in a defensive posture can’t hear coaching.
- Psychological safety first — Frame mistakes as data, not character. “That call had a tricky wrinkle — let’s pull it apart” lands better than “you made an error here.”
- Close with a specific commitment — End every coaching conversation with one thing the agent will try on their next call, and a follow-up check-in within 48 hours.
Deep Evidence
| Case | Date | Duration | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | V2 | Product | Issue Type | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00134890INBOUND | 2026-06-26 | — | 2.8 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 16.7% Needs Improvement | MX2000 | CONNECTIVITY | Advised customer to troubleshoot the TV and desktop directly or contact the manufacturers; offered paid support for further router troubleshooting. |
| #GI00134898INBOUND | 2026-06-26 | — | 1.6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | BEFSR41 | HARDWARE | Agent incorrectly advised contacting Cisco and offered to email the user manual. |