46Calls
2.44Avg Score
20m 42sAvg Handle Time
38Documented
1Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2.44 | 46 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.2 | 46 |
| Protocol | 1.78 | 46 |
| Communication | 2.61 | 46 |
Main focus: Inaccurate LED Guidance
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 55.05% across 41 v2-scored calls this week5 auto-zeros
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 2.38 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.66 |
| Communication | 3.02 |
| Customer Ownership | 4.0 |
| Escalation Judgment | 2.27 |
| Customer Experience | 3.34 |
- Unresolved: 19
- Partial Resolution: 13
- Successful Resolution: 9
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHW | 8 | 27m 57s | 2.35 | 1.5 | 1.38 | 2.62 | Outlier: 2.1x weekly median handle time |
| SPN | 13 | 24m 54s | 2.71 | 2.69 | 2.15 | 2.77 | Outlier: 1.8x weekly median handle time |
| MX | 8 | 20m 38s | 2.63 | 2.5 | 2.12 | 2.88 | Outlier: 1.5x weekly median handle time |
| EA | 3 | 18m 27s | 2.03 | 2.0 | 1.67 | 2.33 | |
| WRT | 1 | 13m 35s | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
| MBE | 1 | 12m 03s | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
| MR | 3 | 8m 31s | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1.67 | 2.33 | |
| E | 2 | 5m 33s | 1.35 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | |
| OTHER | 1 | 4m 19s | 2.8 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 18 | 23m 40s | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2.9 | ✓ |
| ACCESS | 10 | 19m 10s | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 3.1 | |
| SETUP | 7 | 23m 00s | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 3.0 |
What You Did Well
- Precise Mesh PairingUsed in 12 of 38 callsCorrectly applied the 5-press pairing method for WHW03 and MX series nodes across multiple calls, ensuring reliable mesh integration (e.g., #LTS00134185, #LTS00134201).Why this matters: Ensures mesh networks remain fully operational and avoids costly repeat calls for node pairing issues.
- Calm Customer ManagementObserved in 18 of 38 callsMaintained reassuring tone and managed expectations effectively during complex troubleshooting, particularly with frustrated customers (e.g., #LTS00134193, #LTS00134255).Why this matters: Reduces escalations and improves customer satisfaction scores.
Growth Focus
- Inaccurate LED GuidanceAppeared in 9 of 38 callsProvided incorrect LED state information (e.g., 'solid pink' for Velop nodes) and failed to verify product models before instruction, leading to confusion and unresolved issues (e.g., #LTS00134213, #LTS00134247).Why this matters: Materially incorrect guidance risks customer safety, creates repeat calls, and violates protocol accuracy requirements.Example: In #LTS00134213, agent stated 'solid pink' indicates online status for MX6200, contradicting KB which defines solid blue as ready state.What better looks like: Confirm product model first, reference KB for exact LED definitions, and validate state before proceeding.
- Omitted Critical DiagnosticsOccurred in 7 of 38 callsSkipped essential steps like WAN verification, parent node LED checks, and modem isolation before troubleshooting child nodes, causing unresolved connectivity issues (e.g., #LTS00134255, #LTS00134935).Why this matters: Incomplete diagnostics extend resolution time, increase callbacks, and risk misdiagnosis of root causes.Example: In #LTS00134255, agent began 5-press pairing without confirming parent node was solid blue, a required precondition per KB.What better looks like: Always verify parent node status, check WAN connectivity, and perform modem isolation before node-specific steps.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
#LTS00134740LOW
Grader saw: Use http://myrouter.info for router management. Agent to forward request for app compatibility to engineering. No further troubleshooting or confirmation completed.
Agent documented: Educated the cx that the nodes aren’t compatible with the Linksys app * Cx seems disappointed * However, informed the cx that we can still manage the system via the web UI * Cx understood * Accessed http://myrouter.info * Logged into the web UI
Grader marked issue as unresolved ('No further troubleshooting or confirmation completed') while agent documentation implies successful web UI access and login.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Always verify product model and LED state definitions before providing technical guidance, referencing KB articles for exact specifications.Why: Prevents materially incorrect instructions that compromise customer safety and create repeat calls.
- Step 2Complete full diagnostic flow for mesh connectivity issues: 1) Verify parent node solid blue, 2) Check WAN/modem status, 3) Perform modem isolation test before node-specific steps.Why: Skips in diagnostics extend resolution time and risk misdiagnosis of root causes.This week: #LTS00134255 (omitted parent node verification)
- Step 3Never collect or store credit card details over unsecured phone channels; use only documented secure payment pathways.Why: Violates PCI compliance and risks severe regulatory penalties.This week: #LTS00134938 (full card details collected)
- Step 4Confirm successful login/access before proceeding with configuration steps, and provide concise post-resolution recaps.Why: Prevents premature closure and ensures customer confidence in resolution.This week: #LTS00134740 (login declared successful without confirmation)
- Step 5For out-of-warranty devices, first offer KB-aligned self-help steps before suggesting paid support or email instructions.Why: Aligns with OOW best-effort policy and reduces unnecessary service costs.This week: #LTS00134605 (immediate paid support offer without diagnostics)
Escalation Lessons
#LTS00134740 — SPNM60TB
Status: resolved · Category: ACCESS
What happened on the call: Use http://myrouter.info for router management. Agent to forward request for app compatibility to engineering. No further troubleshooting or confirmation completed.
Why it escalated: Customer requested Linksys app compatibility for SPNM60TB nodes after L1 confirmed web UI management only
What L2 did:
- Confirmed SPNM60 series lacks Linksys app support per KB
- Documented engineering request for future app compatibility
- Provided clear web UI access instructions
L1 learning points:
- Always verify app compatibility before troubleshooting
- Use http://myrouter.info for SPNM6x series management
- Document engineering requests clearly with ticket number
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00134185INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 3.5 A 2P 2C 4 | 100.0% Meets / Exceeds | WHW03 | SETUP | Node successfully paired; customer can now relocate and use it. |
| #LTS00134186INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 3 A 3P 3C 3 | 91.7% Meets / Exceeds | SPNMX57CF | CONFIGURATION | Customer instructed to use distinct SSIDs to manually assign devices to 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz bands. No further troubleshooting or confirmation was performed on the primary device (laptop). |
| #LTS00134193INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | — | UNKNOWN | ACCESS | Provide correct guidance: access https://linksyssmartwifi.com, use 'Forgot password' or account settings to change the email, or create a new Linksys cloud account and re-associate the router. |
| #LTS00134197INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 2.8 A 2P 3C 2 | 83.6% Developing | SPNMX56HF | CONFIGURATION | Wi-Fi disabled on router; issue resolved. |
| #LTS00134201INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 3 A 2P 2C 4 | 61.6% Needs Improvement | SPNMX56CF | CONNECTIVITY | Node re-paired and operational; no further action required. |
| #LTS00134206INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 3.8 A 5P 3C 2 | 72.3% Developing | SPNM60CF | ACCESS | Customer successfully logged into the router’s web interface and set a new admin password; mesh nodes are online. |
| #LTS00134213INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 1.8 A 1P 1C 3 | 45.8% Needs Improvement | SPNMX55GC | CONNECTIVITY | Advised to reboot the parent node; issue remains unresolved pending further action. |
| #LTS00134222OUTBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 1.4 A 1P 1C 3 | 38.7% Needs Improvement | E1500 | ACCESS | Agent promised to email step-by-step instructions for retrieving the Wi-Fi password. |
| #GI00134273INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 58.3% Needs Improvement | GENERAL INQUIRY | Informed customer that Linksys does not sell an outdoor bridge; suggested TP-Link product and advised contacting TP-Link for setup. | |
| #LTS00134230INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 2.8 A 4P 2C 3 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MX8500 | CONNECTIVITY | Offered paid-support session and directed to online support articles; no technical fix applied. |
| #LTS00134232INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 2.8 A 2P 1C 3 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Both child nodes re-paired and are now solid green; Wi-Fi bands confirmed. Email follow-up instructions sent. |
| #LTS00134247INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 3 | 66.1% Needs Improvement | MR7350 | CONNECTIVITY | Sent step-by-step email instructions for router reconfiguration; customer to follow. |
| #LTS00134255INBOUND | 2026-06-22 | 2.1 A 2P 2C 3 | 89.4% Meets / Exceeds | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent will email a detailed step-by-step guide and ticket number; customer may call back to complete pairing. |
| #LTS00134404INBOUND | 2026-06-23 | 2.1 A 2P 2C 3 | 78.9% Developing | SPNM60CF | CONNECTIVITY | Customer renamed 2.4 GHz SSID to 'Rall_2.4' and saw it on iPad, but Ring Doorbell connectivity was not tested. No escalation, callback, or follow-up was offered. |
| #LTS00134404INBOUND | 2026-06-23 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 2 | 50.9% Needs Improvement | SPNM60CF | CONNECTIVITY | Customer advised to contact Ring support for firmware updates or compatibility assistance. |
| 915c5eee-6eea-11f1-afa9-42010a62006fINBOUND | 2026-06-23 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 33.3% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer instructed to monitor Wi-Fi performance for 24–48 hours; ticket created for follow-up if issue persists. |
| #LTS00134420INBOUND | 2026-06-23 | 2.2 A 4P 2C 2 | 90.4% Meets / Exceeds | EA6100 | SETUP | Router reconfigured; printer and Ring camera still cannot connect. Customer advised to perform device-specific troubleshooting or consult KB articles. |
| #LTS00028269 | 2026-06-23 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | — | EA6100 | NO TROUBLESHOOTING NEEDED | Agent incorrectly declared issue resolved and closed call despite customer reporting no internet. No valid resolution or next steps provided. |
| #LTS00134437INBOUND | 2026-06-23 | 2.8 A 1P 1C 3 | 39.6% Needs Improvement | WHW01P | CONNECTIVITY | Offered paid 60-minute support for $15 or to email step-by-step instructions; customer chose email. |
| #LTS00134447INBOUND | 2026-06-23 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 3 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WRT3200ACM | SETUP | Agent will email step‑by‑step instructions for accessing the router UI and retrieving the Wi‑Fi password. |
| #LTS00134455INBOUND | 2026-06-23 | 2.8 A 3P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MR7350 | SETUP | Promised to email step‑by‑step reset/re‑configuration instructions; offered paid support for $15. |
| #GI00134460INBOUND | 2026-06-23 | 2.8 A 2P 3C 3 | 81.8% Developing | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | Child node reconnected; router password reset completed. |
| #LTS00134580INBOUND | 2026-06-24 | 3.1 A 2P 2C 3 | 84.7% Developing | SPNMX56TB | ACCESS | Customer accessed the router dashboard; Wi‑Fi name/password can be changed as needed. |
| #LTS00087941INBOUND | 2026-06-24 | 1.8 A 1P 1C 2 | 40.0% Needs Improvement | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent advised purchasing replacement mesh nodes; no warranty verification, escalation, or callback was offered. |
| #LTS00134587INBOUND | 2026-06-24 | 2.8 A 1P 1C 3 | 50.3% Needs Improvement | SPNMX56TB | HARDWARE | Advised customer to contact ISP (Tube) for router replacement; provided ISP phone number. |
| #LTS00134588INBOUND | 2026-06-24 | 1.3 A 1P 1C 2 | 55.4% Needs Improvement | E1200 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent promised to email step-by-step instructions for retrieving the Wi-Fi password, but no instructions were provided during the call and no confirmation of follow-up was established. |
| b23fd688-6fce-11f1-a95c-42010a623f91INBOUND | 2026-06-24 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 2.4% Needs Improvement | MBE7000 | GENERAL INQUIRY | No resolution provided. Call ended without closure, recap, or next steps. |
| #LTS00134605INBOUND | 2026-06-24 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 3 | 52.5% Needs Improvement | EA8300 | CONNECTIVITY | Offered $15 paid support for a 60‑minute troubleshooting session or to email step‑by‑step reset/reconfiguration instructions. |
| #GI00134607INBOUND | 2026-06-24 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | — | SETUP | No resolution; call ended after customer indicated the device is not a Linksys product. | |
| #LTS00134610INBOUND | 2026-06-24 | 1.5 A 1P 2C 3 | 33.8% Needs Improvement | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer to perform modem direct test and mesh reboot per KB. If issue persists, follow up for further troubleshooting or escalation. |
| #LTS00134621INBOUND | 2026-06-24 | 1.8 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | ACCESS | Offered paid-support service; no successful password reset confirmed. |
| #LTS00134612INBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 3.3 A 5P 2C 3 | 62.7% Needs Improvement | MX2000 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer advised to contact Panasonic support (03448443899) for assistance connecting the telephone to the Wi-Fi network. |
| #LTS00134732OUTBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 2.9 A 2P 2C 3 | 61.6% Needs Improvement | MX4200SH | SETUP | Nodes are now online; customer can relocate them. |
| #LTS00134737INBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 3.2 A 5P 2C 3 | 90.4% Meets / Exceeds | SPNM60TB | ACCESS | Customer was instructed to apply changes via the web UI; no confirmation of successful execution was obtained. |
| #LTS00134739INBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 2 A 2P 2C 2 | 81.9% Developing | SPNM60CF | CONNECTIVITY | Customer to attempt Ring doorbell connection after channel changes; agent did not verify success or provide further steps. |
| #LTS00134740INBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 2.8 A 5P 3C 4 | 68.0% Needs Improvement | SPNM60TB | ACCESS | Use http://myrouter.info for router management. Agent to forward request for app compatibility to engineering. No further troubleshooting or confirmation completed. |
| #LTS00134744INBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 2.8 A 4P 2C 2 | — | MR9000 | CONNECTIVITY | Offered paid support ($15) or to email step-by-step instructions for reverting bridge mode. |
| #LTS00134738INBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 1.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 55.0% Needs Improvement | MX4200 | CONNECTIVITY | Escalate to higher tier for hardware evaluation/replacement. |
| 092eb68c-709f-11f1-88e6-42010a623f91INBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 1.4 A 1P 1C 2 | 75.0% Developing | SETUP | Reset parent node via 5-press method, wait for solid blue, then re-add child nodes; callback scheduled to verify completion. | |
| 85833616-70a6-11f1-94e0-42010a660053OUTBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 3 A 3P 2C 3 | 83.3% Developing | CONNECTIVITY | All nodes are now solid blue and the network is operational; no further action required. | |
| 5d5eafd4-70ac-11f1-85d8-42010a660053OUTBOUND | 2026-06-25 | 1.6 A 2P 1C 2 | — | CONNECTIVITY | None – issue remains unresolved. Customer requires reset, browser setup, or replacement guidance. | |
| #LTS00134923INBOUND | 2026-06-26 | 2 A 2P 2C 2 | 50.1% Needs Improvement | SPNMX56CF | ACCESS | Callback scheduled for further troubleshooting; issue remains unresolved. |
| eaa0c4da-715c-11f1-bb12-42010a62006fINBOUND | 2026-06-26 | 3.5 A 4P 2C 3 | 81.9% Developing | SETUP | Issue resolved during call: main node turned solid white, child nodes reconnected. No further action required. | |
| 79bbe922-715f-11f1-9d43-42010a62006fINBOUND | 2026-06-26 | 3.5 A 3P 3C 3 | 70.1% Developing | MX2000 | CONNECTIVITY | Node now shows solid blue; customer can relocate it and use it as part of the mesh. |
| #LTS00134935INBOUND | 2026-06-26 | 1.8 A 1P 1C 3 | 42.9% Needs Improvement | MX4200SF | CONNECTIVITY | Customer instructed to contact ISP to verify modem internet connection; no further Linksys action taken. |
| #LTS00134938INBOUND | 2026-06-26 | 1.8 A 3P 1C 2 | 32.6% Needs Improvement | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | Ticket #134938 created; customer advised to call back for further assistance. |