8Calls
2.44Avg Score
17m 20sAvg Handle Time
7Documented
0Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2.44 | 8 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.75 | 8 |
| Protocol | 1.88 | 8 |
| Communication | 2.25 | 8 |
Main focus: Troubleshooting protocol
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 31.8% across 7 v2-scored calls this week1 auto-zero
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 1.34 |
| Technical Accuracy | 1.7 |
| Communication | 2.32 |
| Customer Ownership | 2.95 |
| Escalation Judgment | 5.0 |
| Customer Experience | 1.53 |
- Unresolved: 4
- Partial Resolution: 2
- Successful Resolution: 1
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX | 2 | 21m 48s | 2.25 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | |
| E | 1 | 21m 23s | 2.5 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | |
| WHW | 4 | 17m 10s | 2.77 | 3.0 | 2.25 | 2.5 | |
| EA | 1 | 4m 58s | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 4 | 25m 58s | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | ✓ |
| SETUP | 2 | 22m 36s | 2.85 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | |
| NO TROUBLESHOOTING NEEDED | 1 | 12m 03s | 1.8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | ✓ |
What You Did Well
- Device info collection7 of 7 callsCorrectly captured product model and serial number across multiple calls, enabling accurate troubleshooting and support decisions.Why this matters: Ensures proper identification for warranty checks, compatible solutions, and efficient escalation.
- Technical accuracy5 of 7 callsProvided correct technical guidance per KB, including factory resets, modem activation requirements, and self-help paths for out-of-warranty devices.Why this matters: Reduces customer confusion and repeat contacts by delivering reliable solutions.
Growth Focus
- Troubleshooting protocol4 of 7 callsSkipped essential diagnostic steps (reboot, power-cycle, LED verification) before offering paid support or self-help, contrary to KB guidance.Why this matters: Increases risk of unresolved issues, repeat calls, and customer frustration due to incomplete problem diagnosis.Example: In #LTS00135235, agent offered paid support without checking WAN LED status or performing a basic reboot.What better looks like: Follow KB troubleshooting sequence: verify power/LEDs, check WAN connectivity, test with wired device before escalating.
- Warranty verification3 of 7 callsStated devices were out of warranty without system lookup or customer confirmation, leading to premature paid-support offers.Why this matters: Violates policy, risks revenue loss, and damages trust by assuming OOW status without verification.Example: In #LTS00135235, agent declared MX5500 OOW without checking serial number or purchase date.What better looks like: Use system tools to verify warranty status before discussing paid support options.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
No documentation mismatches detected this week.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Before offering paid support, verify warranty status using system tools and perform at least three basic troubleshooting steps (power cycle, WAN LED check, wired test).Why: Skipping verification leads to premature paid-support offers, policy violations, and unresolved issues.This week: #LTS00135235
- Step 2When guiding customers through factory resets, explicitly confirm the procedure was completed and re-test connectivity before closing the call.Why: Assuming success without verification increases callback risk and reduces first-call resolution.This week: #LTS00135567
- Step 3Reference KB articles for LED interpretations and pairing procedures; avoid generic statements about device obsolescence without evidence.Why: Incorrect technical guidance erodes trust and can lead to hardware misuse or safety concerns.This week: #LTS00135243
Escalation Lessons
No escalated case learning this week.
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00135235INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 2.9 A 4P 2C 2 | 14.3% Needs Improvement | MX5500 | SETUP | Offered to email a video tutorial and step-by-step instructions; offered $15 paid support if customer wants live assistance. |
| #LTS00135243INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 2.8 A 2P 3C 2 | 62.2% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | SETUP | Agent will email manual setup instructions and video tutorial; optional paid-support offered if needed. |
| #LTS00135246INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 2 | 24.5% Needs Improvement | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent advised the customer to power-cycle and reset the TV's network settings and to contact Vizio support for further assistance. |
| #LTS00135248INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 2.5 A 4P 2C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | E9450 | CONNECTIVITY | Offered paid support ($15) to perform a factory reset over the phone or to send written instructions. |
| 2893f65e-74d7-11f1-845f-42010a62006fINBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.6 A 1P 1C 2 | 60.2% Needs Improvement | MX4200 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent offered to email additional instructions; issue remains unresolved. |
| #LTS00118098INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.8 A 3P 1C 2 | 7.5% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | NO TROUBLESHOOTING NEEDED | Customer to take a picture of the router label and call back for upgrade recommendation. No troubleshooting or self-help resources provided. |
| #LTS00135566INBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 1.4 A 1P 1C 3 | — | EA6350 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent recommended replacing the router due to obsolescence without troubleshooting or offering self-help resources. |
| #LTS00135567INBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 3.7 A 5P 3C 4 | 53.9% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Sent email with step-by-step instructions and video tutorial to reset and re-pair the child node. |