1Calls
1.80Avg Score
30m 44sAvg Handle Time
1Documented
0Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.8 | 1 |
| Technical Accuracy | 1.0 | 1 |
| Protocol | 1.0 | 1 |
| Communication | 2.0 | 1 |
Main focus: Incorrect pairing method
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 20.45% across 1 v2-scored calls this week
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 0.94 |
| Technical Accuracy | 0.94 |
| Communication | 2.5 |
| Customer Ownership | 0.0 |
| Escalation Judgment | 0.0 |
| Customer Experience | 1.79 |
- Ownership Gap: 1
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EA | 1 | 30m 44s | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 1 | 30m 44s | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | ✓ |
What You Did Well
- Customer info collection1 of 1 callsCollected customer's phone number and name across 1 of 1 calls.Why this matters: Ensures proper follow-up and personalized service for the customer.
- Troubleshooting attempts1 of 1 callsAttempted multiple troubleshooting steps (power cycle, reset, pairing) across 1 of 1 calls.Why this matters: Demonstrates thoroughness and effort to resolve issues before escalation.
Growth Focus
- Incorrect pairing method1 of 1 callsUsed 5-press pairing method on a likely SPNM6x series node, which is incorrect (should use Pair button method per KB) across 1 of 1 calls. This misapplication led to unresolved issue and customer frustration.Why this matters: Incorrect technical guidance leads to unresolved issues, repeat calls, and diminished customer trust.Example: In call #LTS00035663, the agent instructed a 5-press reset on a SPNM6x node instead of using the Pair button, resulting in failed pairing and no resolution.What better looks like: Verify product model and use the correct pairing method: Pair button for SPNM60/62 series per led_cog_mesh_group_d_spnm60_62.md.
- Missing model verification1 of 1 callsFailed to collect or confirm product model and serial number across 1 of 1 calls, leading to incorrect troubleshooting path and unresolved issue.Why this matters: Without accurate device details, troubleshooting is guesswork, increasing resolution time and callback risk.Example: In call #LTS00035663, the agent guessed 'SPN MX 55' without verification, causing misapplied troubleshooting steps.What better looks like: Before proceeding, confirm the exact product model and serial number with the customer and cross-reference KB articles.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
No documentation mismatches detected this week.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Before initiating any troubleshooting steps, verify the exact product model and serial number with the customer and confirm against KB requirements.Why: Skipping model verification leads to misapplied procedures, unresolved issues, and repeat calls.This week: #LTS00035663
- Step 2For SPNM60/62 series mesh nodes, use the Pair button method instead of the 5-press reset for pairing.Why: Using incorrect pairing methods prevents successful node registration and causes customer frustration.This week: #LTS00035663
- Step 3Always confirm parent node internet connectivity before attempting child node pairing or troubleshooting.Why: Attempting pairing without internet on the parent node is futile and wastes time for both agent and customer.This week: #LTS00035663
- Step 4When guiding customers through recovery key usage, clearly distinguish it from router passwords and confirm successful authentication.Why: Confusing recovery keys with passwords leads to failed attempts and security risks.This week: #LTS00035663
Escalation Lessons
No escalated case learning this week.
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00035663INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 1.8 A 1P 1C 2 | 20.4% Needs Improvement | EA6400 | CONNECTIVITY | Ticket opened (35663) for further investigation; advise follow-up with correct model verification and proper pairing method. |