46Calls
2.15Avg Score
30m 58sAvg Handle Time
33Documented
1Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2.15 | 46 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.15 | 46 |
| Protocol | 1.74 | 46 |
| Communication | 2.13 | 46 |
Main focus: Model confirmation before guidance
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 32.68% across 45 v2-scored calls this week10 auto-zeros
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 1.63 |
| Technical Accuracy | 1.93 |
| Communication | 1.73 |
| Customer Ownership | 2.16 |
| Escalation Judgment | 1.33 |
| Customer Experience | 1.37 |
- Unresolved: 24
- Successful Resolution: 9
- Partial Resolution: 8
- Ownership Gap: 4
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX | 14 | 43m 01s | 2.21 | 2.14 | 1.71 | 2.14 | |
| SPN | 3 | 36m 09s | 2.1 | 2.33 | 1.67 | 2.33 | |
| WHW | 6 | 34m 02s | 1.93 | 2.5 | 1.33 | 2.0 | |
| E | 4 | 32m 43s | 2.2 | 1.5 | 1.75 | 2.25 | |
| LN | 3 | 24m 55s | 2.87 | 3.33 | 2.67 | 3.0 | |
| MR | 5 | 21m 12s | 2.24 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | |
| EA | 10 | 18m 36s | 2.02 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 2.0 | |
| RE | 1 | 12m 16s | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONFIGURATION | 9 | 24m 00s | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | ✓ |
| CONNECTIVITY | 9 | 27m 00s | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.4 | |
| ACCESS | 2 | 16m 20s | 1.8 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | ✓ |
What You Did Well
- Accurate 5-press guidance3 of 20 callsProvided accurate 5-press method information consistent with KB (universal_5press_models.md confirms MX4200/MX5500 support) across multiple calls including #LTS00135214 and #LTS00135214.Why this matters: Ensures customers can successfully pair mesh nodes without app dependency, reducing support callbacks.
- Clear step-by-step instructions2 of 20 callsGave clear, step-by-step instructions that customers reported understanding and were able to follow, as seen in #LTS00135214 where the customer confirmed comprehension.Why this matters: Improves first-call resolution and reduces repeat contacts.
Growth Focus
- Model confirmation before guidanceAppeared in 1 of 20 callsDid not ask the customer to confirm the model number before giving model-specific guidance, though MX4200 was later confirmed in #LTS00135214.Why this matters: Providing guidance for the wrong model can lead to failed troubleshooting and customer frustration.Example: In #LTS00135214, instructions were given before model confirmation, risking inapplicable steps.What better looks like: Always verify the exact product model and firmware version before providing model-specific troubleshooting steps.
- Verification of node statusAppeared in 1 of 20 callsDid not verify that child nodes successfully entered setup mode (solid purple) after reset, despite customer reporting red/blinking lights in #LTS00135214.Why this matters: Skipping validation steps can leave unresolved issues and lead to callbacks.Example: In #LTS00135214, node status was not confirmed post-reset, leaving resolution uncertain.What better looks like: After resets, always ask the customer to confirm node LEDs show solid purple (setup mode) before proceeding with pairing.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
No documentation mismatches detected this week.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Before closing any call where the issue is not confirmed fixed, ask the customer to test the fix on the call and confirm it works.Why: Skipping confirmation leads to unresolved issues and repeat calls.
- Step 2Always verify the exact product model and firmware version before providing model-specific troubleshooting steps.Why: Providing guidance for the wrong model can cause failed resolutions and customer frustration.This week: #LTS00135214
- Step 3After performing resets, always ask the customer to confirm node LEDs show the expected status (e.g., solid purple for setup mode).Why: Validation ensures the troubleshooting step succeeded and prevents incomplete resolutions.This week: #LTS00135214
Escalation Lessons
#TE00076387 — MX6200
Status: resolved · Category: CONNECTIVITY
What happened on the call: SSID was renamed but functionality not verified; customer still reported missing devices. Follow-up required to confirm 2.4 GHz network operation.
Why it escalated: SSID was renamed but functionality not verified; customer still reported missing devices. Follow-up required to confirm 2.4 GHz network operation.
What L2 did:
- Claimed ticket from TE queue
- Processed callback, verified concern, and resolved
L1 learning points:
- Always verify node functionality after SSID changes
- Confirm 2.4 GHz network operation when devices are missing
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00135214INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 3.6 A 5P 3C 3 | 78.9% Developing | MX4200 | CONFIGURATION | Customer was given step-by-step instructions and confirmed they understood; no further action required. |
| #LTS00135210INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | RE6350 | CONFIGURATION | Agent offered to send an email with configuration steps (not delivered) and suggested paid support; no technical fix was applied. |
| #LTS00135214INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 2 A 1P 2C 2 | 60.1% Needs Improvement | MX4200 | CONFIGURATION | Customer identified missing Ethernet connection and re-plugged it; node now shows blue. Agent advised verifying connectivity after placement but did not confirm. |
| 75dc5e30-73f4-11f1-b016-42010a62006fINBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 3 A 3P 3C 2 | 83.7% Developing | MX5500 | CONNECTIVITY | All nodes returned to solid blue; network restored. |
| #LTS00135247INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1.8 A 5P 1C 2 | 79.2% Developing | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | not_applicable |
| #LTS00135247INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1.3 A 2P 1C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | None – call ended without any action. |
| #LTS00135244INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | not_fixed |
| #LTS00135247INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 44.6% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | Firmware update completed; nodes reported solid white. Call ended without confirming mesh functionality or providing follow-up guidance. |
| #LTS00135244INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 2.8 A 4P 2C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Advised customer to contact ISP regarding possible faulty modem Ethernet port. |
| #LTS00135257INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.8 A 3P 2C 2 | 11.1% Needs Improvement | MR20MS | CONNECTIVITY | No actionable step was given; issue remains open. |
| #LTS00135262INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 2.8 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Node was relocated; signal improved to –60 dBm (excellent). Customer advised to monitor and adjust placement if needed. |
| #LTS00135371INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 2.4 A 3P 2C 3 | 27.7% Needs Improvement | SPNM60 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent will review proof of purchase to verify warranty and then advise next steps; no technical fix applied during call. |
| #LTS00135378INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 2 | 35.0% Needs Improvement | E2500 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer declined paid support and plans to purchase a new router. |
| #LTS00135383INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.4 A 1P 2C 2 | 24.2% Needs Improvement | EA6350 | CONFIGURATION | No resolution; recommend proper extender setup guidance or replacement. |
| #LTS00135388INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.4 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | E5350 | CONNECTIVITY | Offered paid support; customer did not accept; no technical fix provided. |
| #LTS00135407INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 64.8% Needs Improvement | MR6350 | CONFIGURATION | Router successfully set up; internet connectivity confirmed. |
| #LTS00135423INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.8 A 2P 2C 2 | 66.7% Needs Improvement | MX2000 | CONFIGURATION | Scheduled callback for next morning; advised customer to contact Spectrum to verify modem compatibility. |
| #LTS00135436INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 24.9% Needs Improvement | E8450 | CONFIGURATION | No fix achieved; scheduled a follow-up call for next day (ticket LTS001-35436). |
| #LTS00135533INBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 1.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | LN1100 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent asked the customer to reply to the email with proof of purchase; no further technical steps were confirmed. |
| #LTS00135533OUTBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 4.3 A 5P 4C 4 | 59.4% Needs Improvement | LN1100 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer confirmed the router setup was completed and the admin page is accessible. |
| #LTS00135552INBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MR20EC | CONNECTIVITY | None provided. Agent offered paid support and suggested buying a new router without diagnostics. |
| #LTS00135559INBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | EA9500 | CONFIGURATION | Directed to AI chatbot on support.linksys.com; no technical troubleshooting or resolution provided. |
| #LTS00135562INBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 1.8 A 2P 2C 2 | 19.4% Needs Improvement | EA8300 | CONFIGURATION | Customer advised to obtain an Ethernet‑capable device (or USB‑to‑Ethernet adapter) to test the modem directly; no definitive fix achieved during call. |
| #LTS00135584INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 19.7% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent scheduled a callback for the next day to continue troubleshooting. |
| #LTS00135584OUTBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 1.6 A 1P 1C 2 | 81.0% Developing | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | Issue not resolved; follow-up call scheduled for next day to continue troubleshooting. |
| #LTS00135685INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 3 | 37.9% Needs Improvement | E7350 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer will try the AI tool; no further action taken by agent. |
| #LTS00115206INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 2.5 A 4P 2C 3 | 57.2% Needs Improvement | LN1400 | NO TROUBLESHOOTING NEEDED | Customer to run continuous ping test and report results; agent will update ticket and determine further action. |
| #LTS00135696INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | not_fixed |
| #LTS00135698INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MR7350 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent promised to send an email with a video link for self-help. |
| #LTS00135696OUTBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 1.8 A 4P 1C 3 | — | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent promised to call back after the storm but provided no immediate troubleshooting or self-help guidance. |
| #LTS00135714INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 2.2 A 4P 2C 3 | 79.9% Developing | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Power-cycle child node and call back if issues persist. No formal follow-up or escalation path established. |
| #TE00076387INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 1.8 A 1P 1C 3 | 77.5% Developing | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | SSID was renamed but functionality not verified; customer still reported missing devices. Follow-up required to confirm 2.4 GHz network operation. |
| #LTS00135725INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | EA8300 | CONNECTIVITY | Directed customer to https://support.linksys.com for further assistance; no technical fix or specific self-help article was provided. |
| #LTS00135727INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 5P 2C 2 | 14.6% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | CONFIGURATION | Agent provided 5-press reset instructions and advised testing the modem directly. No confirmed resolution or follow-up plan was established. |
| #LTS00135727OUTBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 1.8 A 1P 1C 2 | 33.4% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | CONFIGURATION | Customer instructed to contact Cox to register the new modem and to power-cycle both devices; ticket LTS001135727 created for follow-up. |
| #LTS00135731INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 1.8 A 4P 2C 2 | 10.0% Needs Improvement | EA7450 | CONFIGURATION | Call ended with no resolution or scheduled follow-up. Customer stated they would call back, but no callback was confirmed or documented. |
| #LTS00135731INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 4P 2C 2 | 20.6% Needs Improvement | EA7450 | CONFIGURATION | Offered paid-connect service; customer declined. No technical fix provided. |
| #LTS00135821INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 3.8% Needs Improvement | SPNM60CF | CONNECTIVITY | No resolution or next step provided. Agent incorrectly stated WPS is not supported on SPNM60. |
| #LTS00135823INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 2 | 52.1% Needs Improvement | SPNM60CF | ACCESS | Nodes were added via Instant Pair and showed solid white LEDs, but mesh health was inconsistent. No formal follow-up or escalation was scheduled. |
| #LTS00135856INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 3 | 8.3% Needs Improvement | MR7350 | ACCESS | Offered paid 60‑minute support for $15; customer declined and requested a callback. |
| #LTS00125207INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 57.6% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | SETUP | Internet restored after power cycle. Advise customer to avoid pressing Pair button unless adding a node and to contact support if solid red returns. |
| #LTS00072314INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 3 | 81.0% Developing | EA6350 | CONFIGURATION | Advised customer to review articles on support.linksys.com; no technical fix applied. |
| #LTS00135875INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 3 | 56.9% Needs Improvement | MX4200 | ACCESS | Guest network appears disabled; main Wi-Fi restored. Customer advised to verify in app and keep new admin password. |
| #LTS00135879INBOUND | 2026-07-04 | 1.1 A 1P 2C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | EA8300 | ACCESS | None provided; customer remains locked out. |
| #LTS00135879INBOUND | 2026-07-04 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 65.1% Needs Improvement | EA8300 | ACCESS | Customer can now access the router admin page using the default admin password. No further action required. |
| #LTS00135882INBOUND | 2026-07-04 | 1.8 A 4P 1C 2 | 34.4% Needs Improvement | EA9500 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer to self-troubleshoot with no confirmed follow-up path. |