36Calls
2.33Avg Score
28m 11sAvg Handle Time
30Documented
1Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2.33 | 36 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.72 | 36 |
| Protocol | 1.81 | 36 |
| Communication | 2.11 | 36 |
Main focus: Incomplete resolution verification
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 44.22% across 31 v2-scored calls this week6 auto-zeros
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 2.02 |
| Technical Accuracy | 1.74 |
| Communication | 2.3 |
| Customer Ownership | 2.63 |
| Escalation Judgment | 1.25 |
| Customer Experience | 1.91 |
- Unresolved: 14
- Partial Resolution: 11
- Successful Resolution: 4
- Ownership Gap: 2
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPN | 1 | 89m 45s | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | Outlier: 2.8x weekly median handle time |
| E | 1 | 50m 03s | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | Outlier: 1.5x weekly median handle time |
| MX | 10 | 35m 29s | 2.31 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 2.2 | |
| MR | 4 | 35m 04s | 2.97 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.25 | |
| RE | 2 | 32m 30s | 1.75 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | |
| WHW | 6 | 25m 21s | 2.67 | 3.33 | 2.17 | 2.33 | |
| LN | 5 | 22m 44s | 2.22 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 2.0 | |
| EA | 4 | 7m 13s | 2.55 | 2.5 | 1.75 | 1.75 | |
| OTHER | 2 | 5m 54s | 1.25 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 18 | 25m 50s | 2.3 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 2.7 | ✓ |
| SETUP | 7 | 28m 20s | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.9 | |
| ACCESS | 3 | 20m 00s | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | ✓ |
What You Did Well
- Correct 5-press procedureUsed in 8 of 30 callsCorrectly used the 5-press reset method appropriate for MX6200 and WHW03 devices across multiple calls, as documented in universal_5press_models.md. This was demonstrated in calls #LTS00135172 and #LTS00135221 where node pairing was successfully achieved.Why this matters: Ensures proper mesh node pairing and reduces repeat calls due to incorrect reset methods.
Correctly used the 5-press reset method appropriate for MX6200 devices, as documented in universal_5press_models.md.
- Accurate LED interpretationUsed in 6 of 30 callsAccurately interpreted LED states for MX6200 and WHW03 devices, recognizing that solid white (not solid blue) indicates successful mesh pairing. This was shown in calls #LTS00135172 and #LTS00135221 where correct LED guidance led to successful resolutions.Why this matters: Prevents misdiagnosis of node pairing status and reduces unnecessary troubleshooting steps.
Accurately interpreted LED states: recognized that solid white (not solid blue) indicates successful mesh pairing for MX6200.
Growth Focus
- Incomplete resolution verificationAppeared in 5 of 30 callsFailed to verify internet connectivity through router dashboard or speed test after resolution in several calls, such as #LTS00135221 where the node showed solid white but internet was not confirmed. This pattern appeared in 5 of 30 calls, particularly on MX6200 and WHW03 devices.Why this matters: Leads to unresolved issues and repeat calls as customers may experience connectivity drops after the call.Example: In call #LTS00135221, after achieving solid white LED, the agent declared resolution without testing internet connectivity, resulting in a follow-up call when the issue recurred.What better looks like: After achieving successful node pairing, always ask the customer to verify internet connectivity by opening a browser or running a speed test, and confirm stability before closing.
Did not verify internet connectivity through router dashboard or speed test after resolution.
- Missing diagnostic stepsAppeared in 7 of 30 callsSkipped key diagnostic steps such as modem/WAN status verification and firmware update checks in connectivity issues. This was evident in calls #LTS00135184 and #LTS00135192 where the agent proceeded directly to node resets without checking upstream connectivity, leading to incomplete troubleshooting.Why this matters: Results in misdiagnosis, unnecessary troubleshooting, and higher escalation rates.Example: In call #LTS00135184, the agent began node pairing without verifying the modem's WAN connection, causing delays when the issue was actually upstream.What better looks like: Always perform upstream connectivity tests (modem lights, WAN status, direct Ethernet test) before proceeding to node-level troubleshooting.
Failed to ask about modem/WAN status, which is a standard step for connectivity issues per velop_wifi_connectivity.md Step 2.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
#LTS00135138HIGH
Grader saw: Agent falsely declared the issue resolved and closed the paid session. Suggested upgrading to a newer model (RE7350) but did not confirm current device functionality.
Agent declared resolution without verification while the extender still showed solid amber and connectivity was unstable.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Before closing any call where the issue is not confirmed fixed, ask the customer to test the fix on the call and confirm it works.Why: Prevents unresolved issues and repeat calls due to incomplete verification.This week: #LTS00135221
- Step 2Always verify upstream internet connectivity (modem/WAN status, direct Ethernet test) before proceeding to node-level troubleshooting on mesh systems.Why: Avoids misdiagnosis and unnecessary troubleshooting steps, improving efficiency.This week: #LTS00135184
- Step 3When providing technical guidance, reference the exact KB article and avoid stating facts that contradict documented procedures.Why: Maintains accuracy and credibility, reducing customer confusion and escalation.This week: #LTS00135206
Escalation Lessons
#TE00135777 — WHW03
Status: resolved · Category: CONNECTIVITY
What happened on the call: Issue appears resolved after power cycle; no further action taken or recommended.
Why it escalated: Issue appeared resolved after power cycle but customer reported recurrence; L1 unable to confirm stable resolution.
What L2 did:
- Reviewed ticket and call recording
- Contacted customer to verify connectivity
- Confirmed issue resolved after re-pairing parent node
L1 learning points:
- Always verify internet connectivity after node pairing before closing
- Document LED states and customer confirmation clearly
- Escalate when resolution cannot be confirmed despite appearing successful
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b0bb7ca6-73b4-11f1-80d6-42010a623f91INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 3.6 A 5P 3C 2 | 66.2% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | Nodes paired successfully; internet restored. |
| #LTS00135125INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1.8 A 5P 1C 3 | 100.0% Meets / Exceeds | LN11011202 | CONNECTIVITY | No resolution; call ended without identifying or addressing any issue. |
| #LTS00135125INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1.8 A 5P 1C 1 | 100.0% Meets / Exceeds | LN11011202 | CONNECTIVITY | not_applicable |
| #LTS00135125INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 64.0% Needs Improvement | LN11011202 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer to test cameras on the new 2.4 GHz SSID. No verification performed. Call ended without clear closure or next steps. |
| #LTS00135138INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1.3 A 1P 1C 2 | 53.4% Needs Improvement | RE9000 | SETUP | Agent falsely declared the issue resolved and closed the paid session. Suggested upgrading to a newer model (RE7350) but did not confirm current device functionality. |
| #LTS00135172INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 4.3 A 5P 4C 3 | 76.9% Developing | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Node successfully reset and rejoined the mesh; issue resolved with full customer confirmation. |
| #LTS00135184INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 3 A 4P 2C 3 | 67.7% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | Nodes paired successfully; customer to verify internet connectivity and use 2.4 GHz for smart devices. |
| #LTS00135192INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 3 | 58.0% Needs Improvement | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer will attempt reset and repositioning; agent to send video tutorial via email. |
| #LTS00135202INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 2 | 20.8% Needs Improvement | EA6350 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent recommended purchasing a new MX2000 or MX4200 mesh system; no technical fix applied. |
| #LTS00135206INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | EA6350 | SETUP | Advised to purchase a new router due to alleged defectiveness and end-of-life status, with no diagnostic validation. |
| a4e28794-73eb-11f1-a6e0-42010a62006fINBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | EA6350 | SETUP | Customer decided to contact ISP (Frontier) or Eero for assistance. |
| #LTS00135221INBOUND | 2026-06-29 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent incorrectly declared the issue resolved and closed the call without verification. |
| #LTS00135337INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 3.6 A 5P 2C 2 | — | EA7500 | SETUP | Advised customer to purchase a new router as the EA7500 is end-of-life. |
| #LTS00135342INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.6 A 3P 1C 1 | 44.8% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | SETUP | No resolution achieved. Agent did not provide a valid next step before call ended. |
| #GI00135370INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.8 A 4P 1C 2 | 11.5% Needs Improvement | SETUP | Customer to obtain router serial number/model and call back for further assistance. | |
| #LTS00135380INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 1.8 A 4P 2C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MX4200 | CONNECTIVITY | Offered paid-support session; no technical fix or self-help guidance provided. |
| #LTS00135386INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 2 | 61.0% Needs Improvement | E9450 | SETUP | Provided power-cycle instructions, sent email with detailed setup guide for the range extender, and created support ticket #135386. |
| #LTS00135400INBOUND | 2026-06-30 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 54.4% Needs Improvement | MR6350 | CONNECTIVITY | Several nodes are now solid blue; customer will repeat the reset/5‑press process for remaining nodes and monitor. No further escalation needed at this time. |
| #LTS00080009INBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 1.5 A 1P 2C 3 | — | WHW0301GC | ACCESS | No resolution provided. Advised only to manage locally, which does not address the account email change request. |
| #LTS00135521INBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 1.7 A 1P 1C 2 | 59.2% Needs Improvement | MX8000 | CONNECTIVITY | Child node paired successfully after repeated resets and proximity adjustment; Wi-Fi and internet restored. |
| #LTS00135529INBOUND | 2026-07-01 | 2.2 A 4P 2C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | RE3000W | SETUP | Advised customer to search online for setup guides; no specific resources or actionable steps provided. |
| #LTS00135629INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 2.6 A 4P 2C 2 | 46.9% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Advised customer to contact ISP (Xfinity) for internet service verification and to call back for paid support; provided ticket number 135-629. |
| #LTS00135658INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 2.9 A 4P 2C 2 | 70.3% Developing | LN11011201 | CONNECTIVITY | Node appeared to pair successfully (solid white), but customer reported it later turned red. Advise to monitor and call back if issue recurs. Recommend checking placement and power source. |
| #LTS00072065INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 4 A 4P 4C 3 | 82.7% Developing | MX4200 | CONNECTIVITY | Node returned to solid blue; app now shows all six nodes online. Issue resolved. |
| #LTS00063281INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 29.6% Needs Improvement | MX6200 | CONNECTIVITY | not_fixed |
| #LTS00135658INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 2 | 9.5% Needs Improvement | LN11011201 | CONNECTIVITY | Advised the customer to run a channel scan and consider wireless limitations; no further testing was scheduled. |
| #LTS00081076INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 1.4 A 2P 1C 2 | — | VLP01 | CONNECTIVITY | Provided irrelevant video tutorial for child node setup; no technical troubleshooting or resolution applied. |
| #LTS00135686INBOUND | 2026-07-02 | 3.1 A 4P 3C 3 | 66.1% Needs Improvement | MX2000 | CONNECTIVITY | Advised customer to contact Daikin support as the issue was isolated to the thermostat device. |
| #LTS00135757INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | VLP01 | CONNECTIVITY | None provided; agent incorrectly claimed warranty expired and directed customer to invalid website. |
| #LTS00113548INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | — | MR6350 | CONFIGURATION | Agent will email a Wi-Fi band-separation guide to the customer. |
| #LTS00135762INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 3 | 94.2% Meets / Exceeds | MX6200 | CONFIGURATION | SSID names updated (2.4 GHz renamed with '_2.4' suffix) and security set to WPA2-Personal; customer confirmed Wi-Fi is working. |
| #LTS00135770INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 1 A 1P 1C 1 | 79.3% Developing | MX5500 | CONNECTIVITY | not_fixed |
| #TE00135777INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 3.2 A 5P 2C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Issue appears resolved after power cycle; no further action taken or recommended. |
| #LTS00135788INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 21.4% Needs Improvement | SPNM60CF | CONNECTIVITY | No resolution or actionable next step provided. Customer ended call due to frustration and technical confusion. |
| #LTS00135846INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 3.5 A 5P 2C 3 | — | MR8300 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer confirmed internet is now working; issue resolved. |
| #LTS00135846INBOUND | 2026-07-03 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 33.1% Needs Improvement | MR8300 | CONNECTIVITY | Suggested obtaining a device to test the modem directly or purchasing a new router; no fix achieved. |