18Calls
2.52Avg Score
25m 00sAvg Handle Time
16Documented
0Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2.52 | 18 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.5 | 18 |
| Protocol | 2.11 | 18 |
| Communication | 2.28 | 18 |
Main focus: Technical accuracy gaps
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 53.81% across 17 v2-scored calls this week2 auto-zeros
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 2.76 |
| Technical Accuracy | 2.9 |
| Communication | 2.57 |
| Customer Ownership | 3.22 |
| Escalation Judgment | 0.62 |
| Customer Experience | 2.48 |
- Successful Resolution: 7
- Unresolved: 7
- Partial Resolution: 2
- Ownership Gap: 1
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBE | 1 | 54m 50s | 2.1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | Outlier: 2.0x weekly median handle time |
| WHW | 4 | 38m 07s | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.25 | |
| MX | 2 | 37m 59s | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.0 | |
| MR | 2 | 27m 36s | 2.55 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | |
| EA | 5 | 14m 03s | 1.68 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.8 | |
| SPN | 2 | 12m 00s | 3.55 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
| LN | 2 | 8m 36s | 2.05 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONNECTIVITY | 9 | 28m 00s | 2.56 | 2.22 | 2.44 | 2.33 | ✓ |
| SETUP | 4 | 32m 30s | 2.88 | 3.0 | 2.75 | 2.5 | |
| ACCESS | 3 | 36m 40s | 1.97 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 2.0 | ✓ |
What You Did Well
- Accurate model identification8 of 16 callsCorrectly identified product models (MX4200, WHW03, MR7500) and collected serial numbers across 8 of 16 calls, enabling appropriate troubleshooting.Why this matters: Ensures correct resolution paths and avoids misapplied solutions.
- Effective mesh recovery5 of 16 callsGuided customers through 5-press reset and local UI configuration for MX/WHW series, resolving connectivity in 5 calls (e.g., #LTS00135936, #LTS00136051).Why this matters: Restores network functionality without escalations.
Growth Focus
- Technical accuracy gaps7 of 16 callsProvided incorrect product support statements (EA9500 unsupported claim), wrong URLs (support.linksyss.com), and misapplied 5-press method in 7 calls (e.g., #LTS00135935, #LTS00135936).Why this matters: Risks customer dissatisfaction and repeat calls due to misinformation.Example: In #LTS00135935, agent falsely claimed EA9500 was unsupported without verifying model eligibility.What better looks like: Verify product support status via KB before stating eligibility; use correct support URLs.
- Call control inefficiencies6 of 16 callsLong silences, disorganized information gathering, and lack of closure summaries reduced efficiency in 6 calls (e.g., #LTS00136020, #LTS00136189).Why this matters: Increases handle time and customer frustration; risks unresolved issues.Example: In #LTS00136020, 30+ seconds of silence occurred during parental control troubleshooting.What better looks like: Use structured questioning, acknowledge silences, and provide clear next steps before closing.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
#LTS00135935HIGH
Grader saw: Agent promised generic reset guide but provided only KB article; no active resolution attempted.
Agent documented: Thank you... KB article... device is EOS... advise reset... KB Article...
Agent documented resolution via KB article but grader notes no troubleshooting performed and issue remained unresolved.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Before stating product support eligibility, verify model against KB using the serial number and model provided by the customer.Why: Prevents misinformation that leads to customer frustration and repeat calls.
- Step 2Reserve the 5-press method exclusively for escalation diagnostics; use standard reset procedures for routine issues.Why: Avoids confusion and ensures proper troubleshooting flow.This week: #LTS00135936
- Step 3Implement structured call openings: acknowledge issue, confirm model/serial, and outline next steps within 30 seconds.Why: Reduces silences and improves customer experience.This week: #LTS00136020
- Step 4Practice concise closure summaries: restate issue, solution, and next steps before ending calls.Why: Ensures customer understanding and reduces follow-up needs.This week: #LTS00136189
- Step 5When guiding app usage, verify model compatibility and direct to web UI if the app is deprecated.Why: Prevents wasted time and unresolved issues.This week: #LTS00135991
Escalation Lessons
No escalated case learning this week.
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00135935INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 1.6 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | EA9500 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent promised to email a generic reset/re-configuration guide after the call. |
| #LTS00135936INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 3.1 A 2P 3C 3 | 90.3% Meets / Exceeds | MX4200 | CONNECTIVITY | All nodes are back online and internet is working; no further action required. |
| #LTS00135946INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 3.6 A 3P 3C 3 | 76.8% Developing | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Node is now solid green and operational; no further steps required. |
| #LTS00135991INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 1.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 39.6% Needs Improvement | MR7500 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer will retry adding the third node after resetting; agent offered to call back if issue persists. |
| #LTS00136020INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 2.1 A 2P 3C 2 | 36.7% Needs Improvement | MBE7000 | ACCESS | No resolution; customer left without a working fix or clear next step. |
| #LTS00136048INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 3.3 A 5P 3C 2 | 83.7% Developing | MR7500 | CONFIGURATION | 2.4 GHz SSID renamed; separate network now available for the device. |
| #LTS00136052INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 3 | 47.5% Needs Improvement | LN1200 | CONNECTIVITY | No resolution achieved; recommend full reset and proper pairing procedure (Pair button or 5‑press) as next steps. |
| #LTS00136051INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 4.3 A 5P 4C 3 | 100.0% Meets / Exceeds | MX2000 | SETUP | All nodes are now solid blue and internet is online; no further action required. |
| #LTS00136158INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 2 | 35.6% Needs Improvement | EA6350 | CONNECTIVITY | Advised customer to contact ISP without validating modem connectivity or performing standard diagnostics. |
| #LTS00136174INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | EA6900 | CONNECTIVITY | Agent suggested purchasing a new router from third-party retailers, claiming Linksys does not sell routers and agent is not trained on the device. No technical fix or support path provided. |
| #LTS00136183INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 3 | 61.5% Needs Improvement | SPNMX57CF | SETUP | Reset the node and attempt to add it via the router’s web interface; verify the node shows a solid blue light before proceeding. Pair button method should be used for SPNM6 nodes. |
| #LTS00136183INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 4.3 A 5P 2C 3 | 87.2% Meets / Exceeds | SPNMX57CF | SETUP | Node successfully added and online. Customer can now use the node at its final location. |
| #LTS00136189INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 2 A 2P 2C 2 | 100.0% Meets / Exceeds | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Escalate to senior support for a full mesh re‑setup and WAN verification; schedule a callback. |
| #LTS00136207INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 2.8 A 2P 3C 2 | 91.9% Meets / Exceeds | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Nodes are now paired and operational; no further action required. |
| #LTS00136218INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 1.3 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | LN6001 | ACCESS | Agent advised returning the device and purchasing an MBE7000; did not provide correct web-browser management instructions. |
| #LTS00136232INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | EA7300 | ACCESS | No resolution achieved; customer decided to replace both routers. |
| #GI00136234INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 1.8 A 5P 1C 1 | — | EA9500 | SETUP | No resolution; call ended without troubleshooting or next steps. |
| #LTS00135946INBOUND | 2026-07-08 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 2 | 64.0% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | No resolution achieved. Customer decided to contact Google support for further assistance. No follow-up, escalation, or self-help resources were provided by the agent. |
Feedback
✓ Feedback submitted — thank you!