1Calls
1.80Avg Score
6m 51sAvg Handle Time
1Documented
0Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.8 | 1 |
| Technical Accuracy | 4.0 | 1 |
| Protocol | 1.0 | 1 |
| Communication | 2.0 | 1 |
Main focus: Warranty verification
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 7.5% across 1 v2-scored calls this week
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 0.0 |
| Technical Accuracy | 0.0 |
| Communication | 0.0 |
| Customer Ownership | 2.5 |
| Escalation Judgment | 0.0 |
| Customer Experience | 0.0 |
- Unresolved: 1
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | 1 | 6m 51s | 1.8 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENERAL INQUIRY | 1 | 6m 51s | 1.8 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | ✓ |
What You Did Well
- Polite communication1 of 1 callsAgent maintained a polite tone and offered repeated apologies across the single call handled this week.Why this matters: Polite communication helps de-escalate frustrated customers and maintains brand reputation.
Growth Focus
- Warranty verification1 of 1 callsFailed to verify warranty status, purchase details, or serial number for a defective product claim in the only call this week, leading to an unsupported resolution attempt.Why this matters: Skipping warranty verification risks providing incorrect refunds, violating policy, and creating repeat contacts.Example: In ticket #PR00128785, the agent offered a $22 gift card without checking warranty status or serial number, despite the customer demanding proper replacement.What better looks like: Always verify warranty eligibility (purchase date, serial number, product registration) before offering any resolution for defective hardware.
- Escalation protocol1 of 1 callsDid not escalate to a supervisor despite clear customer frustration and external escalation threat (BBB complaint) in the only call this week.Why this matters: Failing to escalate high-frustration cases risks customer churn, legal complaints, and brand damage.Example: In ticket #PR00128785, the agent ignored the customer's explicit BBB complaint threat and did not initiate escalation.What better looks like: Immediately escalate to a supervisor or manager when customers mention external complaints, threats to reputation, or repeated dissatisfaction.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
No documentation mismatches detected this week.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Verify warranty status, purchase date, and serial number before offering any resolution for defective hardware claimsWhy: Skipping verification leads to incorrect resolutions, policy violations, and repeat contactsThis week: #PR00128785
- Step 2Immediately escalate to a supervisor when customers mention external complaints, BBB involvement, or repeated dissatisfactionWhy: Failing to escalate high-frustration cases risks legal complaints and brand damageThis week: #PR00128785
- Step 3Explain the basis for any refund/replacement offer, including policy references and eligibility criteriaWhy: Unjustified offers erode trust and create compliance risksThis week: #PR00128785
Escalation Lessons
No escalated case learning this week.
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #PR00128785OUTBOUND | 2026-07-08 | 1.8 A 4P 1C 2 | 7.5% Needs Improvement | E8450 | GENERAL INQUIRY | Offered $22 digital gift card (not accepted). No further action taken. |
Feedback
✓ Feedback submitted — thank you!