13Calls
2.17Avg Score
26m 05sAvg Handle Time
9Documented
0Escalated
Week-over-Week Progress
Scorecard
| Dimension | Week Average | Calls Reviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2.17 | 13 |
| Technical Accuracy | 1.77 | 13 |
| Protocol | 1.85 | 13 |
| Communication | 2.46 | 13 |
Main focus: Technical Accuracy
V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)
V2 overall: 45.95% across 10 v2-scored calls this week
| Category | Week Average |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 2.06 |
| Technical Accuracy | 1.44 |
| Communication | 2.62 |
| Customer Ownership | 3.45 |
| Escalation Judgment | 0.0 |
| Customer Experience | 2.5 |
- Unresolved: 4
- Partial Resolution: 3
- Successful Resolution: 3
Where Did the Time Go
By Product Family
| Family | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LN | 1 | 75m 21s | 2.8 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | Outlier: 3.1x weekly median handle time |
| MR | 2 | 56m 40s | 1.95 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | Outlier: 2.3x weekly median handle time |
| WRT | 1 | 33m 25s | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
| WHW | 6 | 15m 36s | 1.88 | 1.5 | 1.67 | 2.33 | |
| OTHER | 1 | 13m 08s | 2.8 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
| MX | 1 | 4m 02s | 1.8 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
By Problem Category
| Category | Calls | Avg Handle Time | Overall | Accuracy | Protocol | Comms | Focus? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETUP | 4 | — | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.25 | 2.5 | |
| ACCESS | 2 | — | 2.8 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
| CONNECTIVITY | 3 | — | 1.73 | 1.0 | 1.33 | 2.33 | ✓ |
What You Did Well
- Essential Info Collection7 of 9 callsConsistently collected model number, serial number, customer name, and email across multiple calls (e.g., calls #EOS00135987, #LTS00136045, #LTS00136075).Why this matters: Enables accurate troubleshooting and ensures proper case documentation.
- Polite Communication6 of 9 callsMaintained calm, empathetic tone and acknowledged customer efforts, especially in sensitive contexts (e.g., calls #EOS00135987, #LTS00136075).Why this matters: Builds trust and reduces customer frustration.
Growth Focus
- Technical Accuracy5 of 9 callsProvided incorrect product support status, invalid URLs, and misapplied reset procedures (e.g., calls #EOS00135987, #LTS00136035, #LTS00136251).Why this matters: Leads to customer confusion, repeated calls, and potential misdiagnosis.Example: In call #EOS00135987, incorrectly stated WRT3200 is 'end of support' and omitted checking the router label for default Wi-Fi password.What better looks like: Verify product support status via KB before stating it, and always advise checking the router label for default credentials on WRT series models.
- Resolution Verification4 of 9 callsClosed calls without confirming issue resolution or providing clear next steps (e.g., calls #LTS00108338, #LTS00136035, #LTS00136075).Why this matters: Increases callback risk and leaves customers without confidence in the solution.Example: In call #LTS00108338, closed without establishing any concrete next step, leaving the customer with no resolution path.What better looks like: Before closing, always confirm the issue is resolved with the customer and document clear next steps if follow-up is needed.
Callback Flags
No callback chains detected.
Documentation Accuracy
No documentation mismatches detected this week.
Practice Plan
- Step 1Before closing any call where the issue is not confirmed fixed, ask the customer to test the fix on the call and confirm it works.Why: Prevents unresolved issues and reduces callback rate.This week: #LTS00108338
- Step 2Always collect product model, serial number, and warranty status at the beginning of the call for registration or configuration issues.Why: Enables accurate troubleshooting and ensures proper case documentation.This week: #EOS00135987
- Step 3Verify product support status via KB before stating it is end-of-support or offering self-help resources.Why: Avoids misleading customers and ensures appropriate support paths.This week: #EOS00135987
Escalation Lessons
No escalated case learning this week.
Evidence Calls
| Case | Date | Score | V2 | Product | Category | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #LTS00108338INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 1.8 A 4P 1C 2 | — | MX8000 | SETUP | Agent stated registration appeared complete and suggested the customer call back if further help was needed, with no specific guidance or action taken. |
| #EOS00135987INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 2.8 A 2P 2C 3 | 47.7% Needs Improvement | WRT3200ACM | ACCESS | Agent will send an email with links to relevant KB articles and further troubleshooting steps. |
| #EOS00135987INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 2.8 A 3P 2C 3 | 52.5% Needs Improvement | SETUP | Agent will email a guide with step-by-step instructions; customer to perform reset and follow manual setup independently. | |
| #LTS00080578INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 3 | 83.8% Developing | WHW03 | SETUP | Customer successfully logged into the router UI and updated Wi-Fi credentials; no further action required. |
| #LTS00136035INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 1.8 A 1P 3C 2 | 40.2% Needs Improvement | WHW03 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer to obtain a laptop with Ethernet to attempt firmware verification (invalid method). Correct next step: verify firmware versions on all nodes match (v1 vs v2), factory reset the child node, and re-add it to the mesh. If issue persists, consider node replacement. |
| #LTS00136045INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 2.8 A 2P 3C 3 | 81.2% Developing | MR7500 | SETUP | Router and child nodes are now configured; Wi-Fi works and speed test is successful. |
| #LTS00136075INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | MR2000 | SETUP | Ticket #136075 created; customer advised to call back for further assistance. |
| #LTS00136085INBOUND | 2026-07-06 | 2.8 A 1P 3C 2 | 83.1% Developing | LN3121 | SETUP | Internet restored; Wi-Fi SSID/password changed; customer confirmed connectivity. |
| #EOS00136198INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 2.8 A 1P 2C 3 | 44.1% Needs Improvement | CF3 | ACCESS | Agent sent email with instructions; customer plans to try a new TP-Link router. Issue not resolved. |
| #LTS00136251INBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 1.1 A 1P 1C 2 | 0.0% Needs Improvement | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | None – customer was left without a working login method or recovery path. |
| #LTS00136251OUTBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 2.3 A 3P 2C 2 | — | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | Customer should confirm whether the label password works. If not, proceed with the recovery-key reset procedure or factory reset as a last resort. |
| #LTS00136251OUTBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 2 A 2P 1C 3 | — | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | Callback scheduled for ~1–1.5 hours later; customer to perform reset then. |
| #LTS00136251OUTBOUND | 2026-07-07 | 1.3 A 1P 1C 2 | 26.7% Needs Improvement | WHW01 | CONNECTIVITY | No confirmed resolution. Agent incorrectly assumed node was fixed based on incorrect LED interpretation. Node remained offline. |
Feedback
✓ Feedback submitted — thank you!