Coach & QA View

francesjessiejr.enriquez@concentrix.com — Week of 2026-06-21 – 2026-06-27

1 Risk Flags

Coaching Summary

Poor performance with critical compliance violations and unresolved issues in the single call handled this week

Provided materially incorrect guidance and failed to collect essential customer information, leading to compliance risks and unresolved issues

Key calls: #GI00012992

Risk Flags

Critical dimension below threshold

Scored accuracy 1.0 and protocol 1.0 due to materially incorrect guidance and compliance violations

ExampleDirected customer to complete a fabricated California legal form with false statements and used a placeholder phone number

Correct behavior: Adhere strictly to KB-verified procedures and never instruct customers to complete legal forms without legal team approval

Impact: Customer was given false legal instructions and non-functional contact information, risking legal exposure and loss of trust

Related: #GI00012992

View ticket #GI00012992

Week-over-Week Progress

No prior-week comparison available yet.

Scorecard

DimensionWeek AverageCalls Reviewed
Overall1.41
Technical Accuracy1.01
Protocol1.01
Communication2.01

V2 Rubric (Shadow Grading)

V2 overall: 0.0% across 1 v2-scored calls this week1 auto-zero

CategoryWeek Average
Resolution2.19
Technical Accuracy2.19
Communication2.5
Customer Ownership4.0
Escalation Judgment
Customer Experience1.79

Score Diagnostics

Based on 1 calls reviewed this week.

Accuracy
1.00
Protocol
1.00
Communication
2.00
Overall
1.40

Technical Findings

improvement
Instructed customer to fill out a fabricated legal form with false statements, violating compliance and accuracy standards.
#GI00012992  ·  call 598dc5d2-6e8d-11f1-9e8d-42010a62006f
improvement
Used a placeholder phone number (925673XXXX) as real contact information, compromising professionalism and accuracy.
#GI00012992  ·  call 598dc5d2-6e8d-11f1-9e8d-42010a62006f

Call Handling Findings

Calibration Notes

None recorded this week.

Callback Chains

No callback chains detected.

Documentation Mismatches

No documentation mismatches found.

Suggested Coaching Conversation

1
You identified 2.4 GHz interference as a factor and adjusted the channel appropriately — this demonstrates strong technical analysis. Can you walk me through how you arrived at that conclusion?
2
In ticket #GI00012992, you directed the customer to complete a fabricated legal form. What verification steps did you take before providing this guidance?
3
Why did you wait until after initial troubleshooting to collect the product model and serial number? How can we ensure this information is gathered upfront?
4
Using placeholder contact information undermines trust — what processes can we implement to ensure all provided details are accurate and verified?

Coaching Best Practices

Five Principles for Effective Coaching Conversations

  1. SBI feedback model — Describe the Situation, the Behavior you observed, and its Impact. Avoid labels (“you always…”) — describe the specific instance.
  2. Ask more than you tell — Start with “What did you notice on that call?” before offering your interpretation. Agents who self-diagnose retain more.
  3. Recognition before correction — Open with a genuine strength observation. Agents in a defensive posture can’t hear coaching.
  4. Psychological safety first — Frame mistakes as data, not character. “That call had a tricky wrinkle — let’s pull it apart” lands better than “you made an error here.”
  5. Close with a specific commitment — End every coaching conversation with one thing the agent will try on their next call, and a follow-up check-in within 48 hours.

Deep Evidence

CaseDateDurationOverallAccuracyProtocolCommsV2ProductIssue TypeOutcome
#GI00012992INBOUND2026-06-221.41120.0%
Needs Improvement
MX2000CONNECTIVITY
Customer to monitor nodes and call back if issues persist. No valid self-help path or confirmed resolution provided.