V2 Rubric Detail — 12cbf206-7bce-11f1-a…

Generated 2026-07-18 01:05 UTC

← Back to comparison table
✓ Feedback submitted — thank you!
Call Start
2026-07-09 19:40
Duration
5m 40s
Contact
770-755-7173
Issue Type
V2 Outcome
Unresolved
V2 Band
Needs Improvement

Agent & Case Context

Agent
HappyFox Case
Support Country
United States
Product Family
Unclassified
CSAT
Sentiment Trajectory
Transcript quality flagged: the ASR/quality-validation pipeline detected and excluded unreliable transcript segments from grading. Excluded from aggregate KPIs — treat remaining scores and transcript with caution.

V1 Rubric Scores

Resolution1.00/5
Accuracy1.00/5
Communication1.00/5
Protocol1.00/5
Efficiency1.00/5
Overall1.0/5

V2 Rubric Scores

Resolution0.00/5
Technical0.00/5
Communication0.00/5
Ownership0.00/5
EscalationN/A
Customer Exp0.00/5
Overall0.0% (-20.0)

V2 Grader Summary

The agent delivered only a generic welcome message and failed to engage in any troubleshooting, diagnosis, or customer guidance. The interaction lacked technical accuracy, communication, ownership, and customer experience elements, resulting in an unresolved issue. Assessment 3’s findings on technical accuracy were authoritative and confirmed no valid technical claims were made, precluding auto-zero for technical reasons.

V1 Case Analysis

Troubleshooting Steps

None recorded.

Key Observations

None recorded.

Positive Highlights

None recorded.

Agent Errors / Gaps

None recorded.

V2 Indicator Ratings

Resolution
R1 Not Met Issue actually resolved conf 98%
Agent only provided a generic welcome message and did not resolve the issue, achieve any outcome, or confirm customer needs.
R2 Not Met Diagnostic thoroughness conf 97%
No diagnostic steps were taken; agent did not ask for model number, symptoms, or perform any troubleshooting despite customer mentioning 'new phones' and connectivity issues.
R3 Not Met Correct resolution path conf 96%
No resolution path (RMA, troubleshooting, escalation, or education) was selected or explained; agent treated the call as a passive greeting only.
Technical Accuracy
T1 Not Met Technically accurate info conf 97%
Agent did not identify symptoms, ask diagnostic questions, or determine root cause; interaction consisted solely of a pre-recorded greeting.
T2 Not Met Appropriate tools / resources used conf 95%
No tools, resources, or evidence-based actions were used; agent relied exclusively on a generic script without engaging in troubleshooting.
T3 Not Met No misinformation conf 96%
Agent provided no technical information, recommendations, or instructions—only a standard welcome message with no product-specific guidance.
Communication
C1 Not Met Clear & professional language conf 95%
Interaction lacked framing, expectations, or control; agent never guided the call, set timelines, or managed transitions despite customer confusion.
C2 Not Met Confirmed understanding conf 94%
Agent used a one-size-fits-all script without adapting to customer’s confused state, confirming understanding, or adjusting terminology/pace.
Customer Ownership
O1 Not Met Ownership & empathy conf 95%
Agent did not take ownership; no effort was made to assist, troubleshoot, or follow through—call was effectively handed off to silence after the greeting.
O2 Not Met Proactive follow-through conf 95%
No next steps, timelines, or follow-up commitments were provided; customer was left without direction or closure.
O3 Not Applicable Closure confirmation conf 90%
This was the first contact with no prior history or handoff to maintain.
Escalation Judgment
E1 Not Applicable Correct escalation decision conf 90%
No escalation occurred, and none was warranted due to the complete lack of issue definition or customer request.
E2 Not Applicable Escalation prep & handoff conf 90%
No escalation was performed, so execution cannot be assessed.
Customer Experience
X1 Not Met Customer effort minimised conf 95%
Agent showed no empathy, acknowledgment of frustration, or professionalism; interaction was entirely transactional and dismissive of customer’s confusion.
X2 Not Met Tone & rapport conf 94%
Agent did not adapt communication tone, pace, or approach to match the customer’s confused and frustrated state.
X3 Not Met Overall experience conf 95%
Customer effort was not reduced; agent provided no assistance, repeated information, or streamlined process—customer was left to self-diagnose.
Call Transcript3 turns · 3 lines
Speaker 1
[silence] He was tired. That's weird that.
00:00
Speaker 2
Welcome to [Linksys] support. To ensure quality service, your call may be monitored. Certain products will be supported, while end-of-support products will have self-help options available. Please have your serial number ready and stay on the line for assistance. While waiting, you may also visit support.linksys.com for more information about your product.
00:00
Speaker 1
Oh, are you? What is that my hand? Yeah, hold on a call. Oh, okay. 0 like a zero. Oh, you need to put the new phones in. I wonder why they're not answering.
03:00