V2 Rubric Detail — 155dbac8-7425-11f1-a…

Generated 2026-07-18 01:05 UTC

← Back to comparison table
✓ Feedback submitted — thank you!
Call Start
2026-06-30 01:43
Duration
14m 4s
Contact
Mary Creegan
Issue Type
General Inquiry
V2 Outcome
Unresolved
V2 Band
Needs Improvement

Agent & Case Context

Agent
Limuel Saura
HappyFox Case
Support Country
United States
Product Family
Unclassified
CSAT
Sentiment Trajectory
Transcript quality flagged: the ASR/quality-validation pipeline detected and excluded unreliable transcript segments from grading. Excluded from aggregate KPIs — treat remaining scores and transcript with caution.

V1 Rubric Scores

Resolution1.00/5
Accuracy5.00/5
Communication1.00/5
Protocol1.00/5
Efficiency1.00/5
Overall1.8/5

V2 Rubric Scores

Resolution0.00/5
Technical0.00/5
Communication0.00/5
Ownership0.00/5
EscalationN/A
Customer Exp0.00/5
Overall0.0% (-36.0)

V2 Grader Summary

The agent only delivered the standard opening script and never engaged with the customer's concern about the router. No troubleshooting, guidance, ownership, or empathy was demonstrated, leading to an unresolved call and a critical abandonment failure.

V1 Case Analysis

Customer unsure if router is causing issue; no troubleshooting performed.

Troubleshooting Steps

None recorded.

Key Observations
  • Agent did not respond to the customer's statement at [12:00].
  • No product information (model, serial, warranty) was collected.
  • No troubleshooting steps, guidance, or self-help resources were offered.
  • Call ended without any operational closure or next-step plan.
Positive Highlights

None recorded.

Agent Errors / Gaps
  • Failure to acknowledge or respond to the customer's concern.
  • No collection of required case details (model, serial, contact info).
  • No troubleshooting or guidance provided despite customer uncertainty.
  • Call abandoned without resolution or follow-up path.

V2 Indicator Ratings

Resolution
R1 Not Met Issue actually resolved conf 95%
Agent provided only the opening script and never engaged with the customer's concern about the router; no resolution or outcome was achieved.
R2 Not Met Diagnostic thoroughness conf 95%
No troubleshooting steps were taken or documented; the agent did not initiate any diagnostic interaction after the customer spoke.
R3 Not Met Correct resolution path conf 95%
No resolution path was selected or communicated — no warranty check, escalation, or best-effort troubleshooting was offered.
Technical Accuracy
T1 Not Met Technically accurate info conf 95%
Agent failed to ask any diagnostic questions or identify symptoms beyond the automated greeting; no logical diagnostic process was applied.
T2 Not Met Appropriate tools / resources used conf 95%
No tools, resources, or evidence were used or referenced; tool use cannot be assessed as none occurred.
T3 Not Met No misinformation conf 95%
No technical information, recommendations, or conclusions were provided to the customer; all technical guidance absent.
Communication
C1 Not Met Clear & professional language conf 90%
Agent gave only the opening script and did not guide the interaction after the customer spoke; no call control or expectation setting.
C2 Not Met Confirmed understanding conf 90%
No adaptation to the customer’s confused tone or level of understanding was observed; communication was not tailored.
Customer Ownership
O1 Not Met Ownership & empathy conf 90%
Agent did not take ownership; the call ended without any action, follow-up, or effort to assist the customer.
O2 Not Met Proactive follow-through conf 90%
No next steps, timeline, or follow-up commitment was given; the case was left with no forward path.
O3 Not Applicable Closure confirmation conf 80%
This appears to be the first contact; no prior case history to reference or handoff context needed.
Escalation Judgment
E1 Not Applicable Correct escalation decision conf 90%
No escalation was made and none was warranted based on the limited interaction; no trigger for escalation present.
E2 Not Applicable Escalation prep & handoff conf 90%
No escalation occurred, so execution cannot be assessed.
Customer Experience
X1 Not Met Customer effort minimised conf 90%
Agent did not acknowledge the customer’s frustration or show empathy; response was entirely transactional and dismissive.
X2 Not Met Tone & rapport conf 90%
Agent did not adjust tone, pace, or style to match the customer’s confused and uncertain state; no engagement adaptation.
X3 Not Met Overall experience conf 90%
Customer was left to repeat concerns without any effort to reduce friction; no attempt to avoid unnecessary repetition or steps.
Call Transcript2 turns · 2 lines
Speaker 2
[silence] Welcome to Linksys support. To ensure quality service, your call may be monitored. [silence] For in-warranty products, our support team is available to help with performance and hardware issues. [silence] Register your product by visiting register.linksys.com. [silence] Please have your device serial number ready. [silence] For assistance, press one now. [silence] For out of warranty products, paid support may be available depending on your issue. Please have your device's serial number and contact information ready. [silence] If unavailable, kindly call back later. [silence] For out of warranty product, paid support option may be available depending on the issue. [silence]
00:00
Speaker 1
yeah I think I'm on something she's saying it's the router but it can't be the router but I don't know what to think about I don't know anything about it
12:00