V2 Rubric Detail — 2315fcce-8231-11f1-8…

Generated 2026-07-18 01:05 UTC

← Back to comparison table
✓ Feedback submitted — thank you!
Call Start
2026-07-17 22:44
Duration
8m 13s
Contact
608-209-3988
Issue Type
Unknown
V2 Outcome
Partial Resolution
V2 Band
Needs Improvement

Agent & Case Context

Agent
HappyFox Case
Support Country
United States
Product Family
Unclassified
CSAT
Sentiment Trajectory
Transcript quality flagged: the ASR/quality-validation pipeline detected and excluded unreliable transcript segments from grading. Excluded from aggregate KPIs — treat remaining scores and transcript with caution.

V1 Rubric Scores

Resolution1.00/5
Accuracy5.00/5
Communication3.00/5
Protocol2.00/5
Efficiency1.00/5
Overall1.8/5

V2 Rubric Scores

ResolutionN/A
TechnicalN/A
Communication2.50/5
OwnershipN/A
EscalationN/A
Customer ExpN/A
Overall50.0% (+14.0)

V2 Grader Summary

The transcript contains only an initial greeting and request for a serial number with no subsequent customer interaction or issue presentation. The agent partially met C1 by setting minimal expectations but failed to provide full call control, framing, or transitions. All other indicators are Not Applicable due to the absence of any diagnostic, resolution, ownership, or experiential elements. No critical failures (e.g., abandonment, discourtesy) occurred to trigger auto-zero.

V1 Case Analysis

Customer did not respond after greeting; no issue captured. Brand name misspelled in greeting.

Troubleshooting Steps

None recorded.

Key Observations
  • Customer never engaged after the initial greeting.
  • No product model, serial number, or issue was identified.
  • Call ended without any troubleshooting, re-engagement attempt, or next step offered.
  • Brand name 'Linksys' was misspelled as 'inksis' in the greeting.
Positive Highlights
  • Clear, professional compliance disclosure at timestamp 00:00.
  • Correctly instructed customer to have serial number ready per standard protocol.
Agent Errors / Gaps
  • Misspelled 'Linksys' as 'inksis' in the greeting, indicating a brand name accuracy error.
  • Did not attempt to re-engage the silent customer after initial request.
  • No model or serial number collected beyond the initial request.
  • No effort made to determine the reason for the silence or to offer a callback option.
  • Allowed the call to end in silence without closing the interaction professionally.

V2 Indicator Ratings

Resolution
R1 Not Applicable Issue actually resolved conf 100%
No customer issue was presented; the interaction did not progress beyond the initial greeting.
R2 Not Applicable Diagnostic thoroughness conf 100%
No troubleshooting was initiated or described in the transcript.
R3 Not Applicable Correct resolution path conf 100%
No product, warranty, or support path was discussed; no resolution path could be established.
Technical Accuracy
T1 Not Applicable Technically accurate info conf 100%
Agent did not engage in any diagnostic questioning or symptom identification.
T2 Not Applicable Appropriate tools / resources used conf 100%
No tools, resources, or evidence-based checks were used or referenced.
T3 Not Applicable No misinformation conf 100%
No technical information, recommendations, or conclusions were provided.
Communication
C1 Partially Met Clear & professional language conf 95%
Agent set an expectation to have the serial number ready and to stay on the line, but provided no further framing, structure, or call control beyond a single instruction. No confirmation of understanding, no transition into the support phase, and no active guidance once the greeting ended.
C2 Not Applicable Confirmed understanding conf 100%
No actual interaction with the customer occurred to assess adaptation to their level or style.
Customer Ownership
O1 Not Applicable Ownership & empathy conf 100%
No case was opened or owned; the agent did not take responsibility for any issue.
O2 Not Applicable Proactive follow-through conf 100%
No next steps, timelines, or follow-up commitments were established.
O3 Not Applicable Closure confirmation conf 100%
No prior history or handoff context was involved or referenced.
Escalation Judgment
E1 Not Applicable Correct escalation decision conf 100%
No escalation occurred and none was warranted due to lack of customer issue.
E2 Not Applicable Escalation prep & handoff conf 100%
No escalation took place to evaluate execution quality.
Customer Experience
X1 Not Applicable Customer effort minimised conf 100%
No customer frustration or emotional state was expressed or addressed.
X2 Not Applicable Tone & rapport conf 100%
No sustained interaction occurred to assess tone, pace, or engagement adaptation.
X3 Not Applicable Overall experience conf 100%
The only request was for a serial number, which is standard, but no further effort reduction could be observed.
Call Transcript1 turns · 1 lines
Speaker 2
Welcome to **inksis** support. To ensure quality service, your call may be monitored. Certain products will be supported, while end of support products will have self-help options available. Please have your serial number ready and stay on the line for assistance. [silence]
00:00