V2 Rubric Detail — 7960a7fe-7945-11f1-a…

Generated 2026-07-18 01:05 UTC

← Back to comparison table
✓ Feedback submitted — thank you!
Call Start
2026-07-06 14:17
Duration
9m 7s
Contact
Tina Bellings
Issue Type
Hardware Fault
V2 Outcome
Unresolved
V2 Band
Needs Improvement

Agent & Case Context

Agent
Maylene Delada
HappyFox Case
#LTS00135960
Support Country
Other / Unmapped
Product Family
MESH SYSTEMS
CSAT
Sentiment Trajectory
Ticket subject: Adding child node
Transcript quality flagged: the ASR/quality-validation pipeline detected and excluded unreliable transcript segments from grading (3 hallucinated segments). Excluded from aggregate KPIs — treat remaining scores and transcript with caution.

V1 Rubric Scores

Resolution1.00/5
Accuracy1.00/5
Communication1.00/5
Protocol1.00/5
Efficiency1.00/5
Overall1.0/5

V2 Rubric Scores

ResolutionN/A
TechnicalN/A
CommunicationN/A
OwnershipN/A
EscalationN/A
Customer ExpN/A
Overall0.0% (-20.0)

V2 Grader Summary

The transcript consists solely of a customer speaking in Dutch about their device setup, with no agent response or interaction visible. As a result, none of the 16 behavioral indicators can be assessed, and no progress toward resolution was made. The interaction shows no evidence of abandonment, evasion, or misconduct—only incomplete data.

V1 Case Analysis

Customer reported incompatibility between series-5 and series-7 devices. No agent response or troubleshooting performed.

Troubleshooting Steps

None recorded.

Key Observations
  • Only customer speech is present from [02:00]; no agent dialogue recorded in the transcript.
  • Customer speaks in Dutch, describing a topology involving a series-5 and series-7 device, likely referring to Linksys mesh nodes (e.g., Velop series), but no agent clarification or translation attempt was made.
  • No troubleshooting steps, model verification, or compatibility check was initiated by the agent.
Positive Highlights

None recorded.

Agent Errors / Gaps
  • Agent did not respond to the customer at any point during the call.
  • No attempt to collect product model, serial number, or clarify the customer's language or issue.
  • No troubleshooting flow was initiated despite a clear customer-reported hardware compatibility concern.
  • Call ended without any resolution, next step, or escalation path being provided.

V2 Indicator Ratings

Resolution
R1 Not Applicable Issue actually resolved conf 100%
No agent interaction or resolution attempt is present in the transcript; only customer statements in Dutch about device placement and series differences.
R2 Not Applicable Diagnostic thoroughness conf 100%
No troubleshooting steps were initiated or documented by the agent; the transcript contains only customer monologue.
R3 Not Applicable Correct resolution path conf 100%
No resolution path was selected or discussed; no product status, warranty, or support option was addressed by an agent.
Technical Accuracy
T1 Not Applicable Technically accurate info conf 100%
The agent did not engage in diagnostic questioning, identify symptoms, or determine a root cause.
T2 Not Applicable Appropriate tools / resources used conf 100%
No tools (web UI, logs, remote access) were used or referenced by the agent during the interaction.
T3 Not Applicable No misinformation conf 100%
No technical information, recommendations, or conclusions were provided by the agent.
Communication
C1 Not Applicable Clear & professional language conf 100%
No call framing, control, or transitions are evident; the agent does not speak in the provided transcript.
C2 Not Applicable Confirmed understanding conf 100%
No adaptation to customer level, style, or comprehension checks are observable due to absence of agent speech.
Customer Ownership
O1 Not Applicable Ownership & empathy conf 100%
No ownership demonstrated; no transfer decisions or commitments made by the agent are visible.
O2 Not Applicable Proactive follow-through conf 100%
No next steps, timelines, or follow-up commitments were established by the agent.
O3 Not Applicable Closure confirmation conf 100%
No prior history was referenced and no handoff occurred; agent did not participate in the interaction.
Escalation Judgment
E1 Not Applicable Correct escalation decision conf 100%
No escalation was made, and none was warranted based on the lack of agent involvement.
E2 Not Applicable Escalation prep & handoff conf 100%
No escalation execution details are present as no escalation occurred and no agent action took place.
Customer Experience
X1 Not Applicable Customer effort minimised conf 100%
No empathy, professionalism, or patience cues from the agent are captured in the transcript.
X2 Not Applicable Tone & rapport conf 100%
Agent did not respond to customer tone, pace, or emotional state; no engagement is visible.
X3 Not Applicable Overall experience conf 100%
Customer effort was not reduced or increased by agent actions since no agent interaction occurred.
Call Transcript1 turns · 1 lines
Speaker 1
[KEEP_UNCERTAIN] ... de reden waarmee dat niet werkt is dat bakje van de linkse originele dat daarachter stond is de serie 5. Het ding dat ik gekocht heb is de serie 7. Dat connecteert wel met elkaar maar dat moet iets anders zo was me daar aan het hoeken praten maar natuurlijk omdat ik het internet had afgezet ging de telefoon ook eh oké [silence] dat lukt wel. Maar we moeten dat gewoon proberen. En die 7 is veel sterker. Dus ik denk zelfs dat ik die hier moest zetten, dat die in de stapkamers ook werkt, omdat die veel sterker is.
02:00