V2 Rubric Detail — ac06dc72-6e9c-11f1-a…

Generated 2026-07-18 01:05 UTC

← Back to comparison table
✓ Feedback submitted — thank you!
Call Start
2026-06-23 00:44
Duration
8m 33s
Contact
614-309-6614
Issue Type
Unknown
V2 Outcome
Unresolved
V2 Band
Needs Improvement

Agent & Case Context

Agent
HappyFox Case
Support Country
United States
Product Family
Unclassified
CSAT
Sentiment Trajectory
Transcript quality flagged: the ASR/quality-validation pipeline detected and excluded unreliable transcript segments from grading (1 hallucinated segment). Excluded from aggregate KPIs — treat remaining scores and transcript with caution.
Auto-Zero applied: Avoidance/Evasion – agent provided no relevant assistance, failed to engage in any troubleshooting, and offered no value to the customer.

V1 Rubric Scores

Resolution1.00/5
Accuracy5.00/5
Communication1.00/5
Protocol1.00/5
Efficiency1.00/5
Overall1.8/5

V2 Rubric Scores

Resolution0.00/5
Technical0.00/5
Communication0.00/5
Ownership0.00/5
EscalationN/A
Customer Exp0.00/5
Overall0.0% (-36.0)

V2 Grader Summary

The call consists of a generic welcome followed by incoherent, unrelated agent speech with no identification of a customer issue, no troubleshooting, and no resolution path. The agent failed to demonstrate ownership, technical accuracy, or professional communication. This constitutes a clear Avoidance/Evasion failure, resulting in an Unresolved outcome.

V1 Case Analysis

No issue identified; no troubleshooting performed.

Troubleshooting Steps

None recorded.

Key Observations
  • No identifiable customer issue was captured.
  • Agent did not collect any product, serial, or warranty details.
  • Call contained no troubleshooting, guidance, or closure steps.
Positive Highlights

None recorded.

Agent Errors / Gaps
  • Failed to engage the customer or ask for the problem.
  • Did not gather required product or warranty information.
  • Provided no troubleshooting or next‑step guidance.

V2 Indicator Ratings

Resolution
R1 Not Met Issue actually resolved conf 100%
No issue was identified or resolved; the agent did not engage with a technical problem or provide any resolution path.
R2 Not Met Diagnostic thoroughness conf 100%
Agent performed no troubleshooting steps, asked no diagnostic questions, and did not attempt to identify or isolate a technical issue.
R3 Not Met Correct resolution path conf 100%
No resolution path (RMA, escalation, self-help, etc.) was selected or communicated; agent failed to determine product status or support eligibility.
Technical Accuracy
T1 Not Met Technically accurate info conf 100%
No logical diagnostic process was applied; agent did not identify symptoms, ask relevant questions, or determine a root cause.
T2 Not Met Appropriate tools / resources used conf 100%
No tools, resources, or evidence (e.g., admin UI, logs, KB) were used; agent did not access any diagnostic or support system.
T3 Not Met No misinformation conf 100%
No technical information, recommendations, or conclusions were provided; agent’s speech was incoherent and unrelated to support.
Communication
C1 Not Met Clear & professional language conf 100%
Interaction lacked framing, call control, or transitions; agent spoke incoherently and lost control immediately.
C2 Not Met Confirmed understanding conf 100%
Communication was not adapted to customer level; no comprehension checks, and content was nonsensical.
Customer Ownership
O1 Not Met Ownership & empathy conf 100%
Agent did not take ownership, ask for device details, or make any effort to resolve an issue.
O2 Not Met Proactive follow-through conf 100%
No next steps, timelines, or follow-up commitments were established or communicated.
O3 Not Applicable Closure confirmation conf 95%
No indication of prior contact or case history; cannot assess continuity.
Escalation Judgment
E1 Not Applicable Correct escalation decision conf 95%
No escalation occurred and none was warranted due to lack of a defined customer issue.
E2 Not Applicable Escalation prep & handoff conf 95%
No escalation was performed, so execution cannot be evaluated.
Customer Experience
X1 Not Met Customer effort minimised conf 100%
Agent showed no empathy, professionalism, or patience; dialogue was disjointed and unresponsive to customer needs.
X2 Not Met Tone & rapport conf 100%
Agent did not adapt tone, pace, or style; customer would have been confused and disengaged.
X3 Not Met Overall experience conf 100%
Call added significant friction—no useful information gathered, and customer would need to repeat everything.
Call Transcript2 turns · 4 lines
Speaker 2
Welcome to Linksys support. To ensure quality service, your call may be monitored. For in warranty products, our support team is available to help with performance and hardware issues. Register your product by visiting register.linksys.com. Please have your device serial number ready. For assistance, press one now. For out of warranty products, paid support may be available depending on your issue. To hear more, please have your device's serial number and contact information ready. If unavailable, kindly call back later. For out of warranty products, paid support option may be available depending on the issue. [silence]
00:00
Speaker 1
Well, now let's let's let's let's let's listen. She walks into the room. Know that the answer. Mr. Yeah. You're Yeah. Yes. You're right. I think that's just a general child. Why. Why. To the. to the.
03:00