V2 Rubric Detail — c40b7da6-6b3a-11f1-8…

Generated 2026-07-18 01:05 UTC

← Back to comparison table
✓ Feedback submitted — thank you!
Call Start
2026-06-18 17:25
Duration
6m 16s
Contact
321-218-7145
Issue Type
General Inquiry
V2 Outcome
Unresolved
V2 Band
Needs Improvement

Agent & Case Context

Agent
HappyFox Case
Support Country
United States
Product Family
SMB PRODUCTS
CSAT
Sentiment Trajectory
Transcript quality flagged: the ASR/quality-validation pipeline detected and excluded unreliable transcript segments from grading (1 too-garbled-to-score segment). Excluded from aggregate KPIs — treat remaining scores and transcript with caution.
Auto-Zero applied: B — Avoidance/Evasion: Agent acknowledged the request with 'Yes' but took no action, asked no clarifying questions, and effectively avoided addressing the customer's need, implying passive evasion of responsibility.

V1 Rubric Scores

Resolution1.00/5
Accuracy1.00/5
Communication1.00/5
Protocol1.00/5
Efficiency1.00/5
Overall1.0/5

V2 Rubric Scores

Resolution0.00/5
Technical0.00/5
Communication0.00/5
Ownership0.00/5
EscalationN/A
Customer Exp0.00/5
Overall0.0% (-20.0)

V2 Grader Summary

The agent failed to address the customer's request for a 'statement of volatility' with any meaningful action, troubleshooting, or ownership. Communication was minimal, with no clarification, next steps, or empathy. The interaction represents avoidance of responsibility, warranting an auto-zero for Avoidance/Evasion (B).

V1 Case Analysis

Troubleshooting Steps

None recorded.

Key Observations

None recorded.

Positive Highlights

None recorded.

Agent Errors / Gaps

None recorded.

V2 Indicator Ratings

Resolution
R1 Not Met Issue actually resolved conf 99%
Agent did not resolve the request for a 'statement of volatility' or provide any alternative outcome such as escalation, explanation of limitation, or path forward.
R2 Not Met Diagnostic thoroughness conf 98%
No diagnostic steps were taken — agent did not ask for model number, clarify what document was needed, or check internal resources.
R3 Not Met Correct resolution path conf 98%
Agent failed to determine product, warranty, or support path; no attempt to assess whether such a document exists or how to obtain it.
Technical Accuracy
T1 Not Met Technically accurate info conf 97%
Agent did not identify symptoms or ask relevant questions; 'statement of volatility' was not explored or defined.
T2 Not Met Appropriate tools / resources used conf 96%
No use of KB, internal tools, or escalation path to address an unusual request that likely required research or special handling.
T3 Not Met No misinformation conf 97%
Agent provided no technical information — only a vague 'Yes' that did not confirm understanding or accuracy.
Communication
C1 Not Met Clear & professional language conf 95%
No call framing, expectation setting, or control; interaction was passive and reactive with long silences.
C2 Not Met Confirmed understanding conf 95%
Agent did not adapt communication to clarify the ambiguous request or confirm understanding of 'statement of volatility'.
Customer Ownership
O1 Not Met Ownership & empathy conf 96%
Agent did not take ownership of the request — no commitment to follow up, retrieve document, or involve another team.
O2 Not Met Proactive follow-through conf 97%
No next steps, timeline, or follow-up promised — customer left without direction.
O3 Not Applicable Closure confirmation conf 100%
First contact; no prior history or handoff occurred.
Escalation Judgment
E1 Not Applicable Correct escalation decision conf 98%
No escalation occurred and none was clearly warranted — request was unusual but not inherently complex or urgent.
E2 Not Applicable Escalation prep & handoff conf 98%
No escalation was performed, so execution cannot be assessed.
Customer Experience
X1 Not Met Customer effort minimised conf 96%
Agent showed no empathy or acknowledgment of customer effort; response was minimal and transactional.
X2 Not Met Tone & rapport conf 95%
Agent did not match customer’s tone or pace; failed to engage or adjust despite customer repeating the request.
X3 Not Met Overall experience conf 96%
Customer had to repeat the request; agent created no path forward, increasing customer effort.
Call Transcript6 turns · 6 lines
Speaker 1
Hi there, I was actually just wondering if you could send me over a statement or letter of volatility for a particular Linksys switch model.
00:00
Speaker 2
[silence]
00:00
Speaker 1
It is for a letter of volatility or a statement of volatility? Uh is for a letter of volatility or a statement of volatility. Of course, thank you so much. [silence]
01:00
Speaker 2
Yes. [silence] sure, thank you so much for that one.
05:00
Speaker 1
very helpful, I appreciate it. no, that is all I appreciate it thank you so much. thanks, have a great day, bye-bye. [silence]
06:00
Speaker 2
All right. Is there anything else? Thank you so much for calling Linksys as well. Take care, and have a great day. Bye-bye for now.
06:00